GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,706
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,916
Welcome to our newest member, zaohnpetrovz920
» Online Users: 1,461
1 members and 1,460 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2004, 11:23 AM
aurora_borealis aurora_borealis is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,106
Tom DeLay and Possible Grand Jury Indictment

CNN Link

Republicans move to protect DeLay
Wednesday, November 17, 2004 Posted: 8:52 AM EST (1352 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Moving to protect Majority Leader Tom DeLay, House Republicans want to change party rules to ensure that DeLay retains his post if a Texas grand jury indicts him as it did with three of his political associates.

The House Republican Conference, composed of all GOP members in the chamber, planned to vote Wednesday to modify a requirement that would force DeLay to step aside if charged with a felony requiring at least a two-year prison term.

Party rules require leaders to relinquish their posts after a felony indictment, but the change would eliminate the requirement for non-federal indictments.

A grand jury in Travis County, Texas, is investigating alleged irregularities in 2002 state legislative races. Republican victories in those contests enabled DeLay ultimately to win support for a congressional redistricting plan that resulted in the GOP's gain of five House seats in Texas in this month's elections.

There is no indication that DeLay faces charges, but the majority leader has called the investigation -- led by a retiring Democratic prosecutor -- a partisan attack on him.

The new language was proposed by Rep. Henry Bonilla, R-Texas, who was helped by the redistricting. Bonilla was re-elected in 2002 with less than 52 percent of the vote. After the boundaries were changed, he won this month with 69 percent of the vote.

Jessica Boulanger, spokeswoman for third-ranking House Republican Roy Blunt of Missouri, said Tuesday her boss supported the proposal.

The majority whip "believes the allegations are baseless, and they were political in nature. So he supports the proposed rules change by Congressman Bonilla."

Bonilla spokeswoman Taryn Fritz Walpole said the proposed change is intended to "prevent political manipulation of the legislative process" and reduce the possibility of "political exploitation and intimidation of House leadership and chairmanship positions."

House Democrats have a step-aside provision that applies to federal and state proceedings similar to the current Republican rule, and their leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, was highly critical of the GOP proposal.

"If they make this rules change, Republicans will confirm yet again that they simply do not care if their leaders are ethical. If Republicans believe that an indicted member should be allowed to hold a top leadership position in the House of Representatives, their arrogance is astonishing," Pelosi said.

In September, the grand jury indicted three political operatives associated with DeLay and eight companies, alleging campaign finance violations related to corporate money spent in the 2002 legislative races. The corporate donations were made to Texans for a Republican Majority, a political action committee created with help from DeLay.

DeLay said he was not questioned or subpoenaed as part of the investigation, led by retiring prosecutor Ronnie Earle.

The majority leader said after the indictments, "This has been a dragged-out 500-day investigation, and you do the political math. This is no different than other kinds of partisan attacks that have been leveled against me that are dropped after elections."

In October, the House ethics committee rebuked DeLay for appearing to link political donations to a legislative favor and improperly persuading U.S. aviation authorities to intervene in the Texas redistricting dispute.

Fox Link
DeLay Backers Close Ranks
Tuesday, November 16, 2004

WASHINGTON — Supporters of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (search) proposed a Republican rules change Tuesday that would protect the Texan's leadership position if he were to be indicted by a Texas grand jury that already charged three of his associates.

House Republicans are likely to approve Wednesday the change in the rule that would force him to step aside if indicted. The show of support would be an endorsement of DeLay's position that the Travis County investigation is a partisan attack.

Currently, rules of the House Republican Conference, which comprises all House GOP members, requires leaders to resign the party post if they are indicted for a felony punishable by two or more years in jail. The proposed change would eliminate the step-aside requirement for nonfederal indictments.

The Texas grand jury is investigating alleged campaign finance irregularities in 2002 state legislative races. Republican victories in those contests enabled DeLay ultimately to win support for a congressional redistricting (search) plan that resulted in the GOP's gain of five seats in this month's elections.

House Democrats have a step-aside provision that applies to chairmen or ranking members of committees who are charged with felonies. The language is silent on top party leaders, but Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (search) of California was nonetheless sharply critical of the proposal to protect DeLay.


"If they make this rules change, Republicans will confirm yet again that they simply do not care if their leaders are ethical. If Republicans believe that an indicted member should be allowed to hold a top leadership position in the House of Representatives, their arrogance is astonishing," Pelosi said.

The language was proposed by Rep. Henry Bonilla, R-Texas, who was helped by the redistricting. Bonilla was re-elected in 2002 with less than 52 percent of the vote. After the boundaries were changed, he won this month with 69 percent of the vote.

Jessica Boulanger, spokeswoman for third-ranking House Republican Roy Blunt of Missouri, confirmed the proposal and said Blunt supported it.

The majority whip "believes the allegations are baseless, and they were political in nature. So he supports the proposed rules change by congressman Bonilla."

Bonilla spokeswoman Taryn Fritz Walpole said the proposed change is intended to "prevent political manipulation of the legislative process" and reduce the possibility of "political exploitation and intimidation of House leadership and chairmanship positions."

The Texas investigation is led by a Democrat, retiring Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle.

In September, the grand jury indicted three political operatives associated with DeLay and eight companies, alleging campaign finance violations related to corporate money spent in the 2002 legislative races. The corporate donations were made to Texans for a Republican Majority (search), a political action committee created with help from DeLay.

DeLay said he was not questioned or subpoenaed as part of the investigation.

The majority leader said after the indictments, "This has been a dragged-out 500-day investigation, and you do the political math. This is no different than other kinds of partisan attacks that have been leveled against me that are dropped after elections."

In October, the House ethics committee rebuked DeLay for appearing to link political donations to a legislative favor and improperly persuading U.S. aviation authorities to intervene in the Texas redistricting dispute.

(I posted both to be fair, but I actually heard this on NPR news and they don't have nearly the detail as these two in print)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2004, 01:33 PM
DeltAlum DeltAlum is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
It will be a most interesting political and public relations problem for the GOP if there is an indictment.

It will be worse if there is a trial.

If there's a conviction???
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2004, 10:36 AM
aurora_borealis aurora_borealis is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,106
The thing that gets me, is that if you're a convicted felon you lose various rights depending on where you live. I'll use voting as an example. If an elected official can't vote, I really don't think having them representing people is a good idea.

Doesn't matter to me that it is DeLay, if it was anyone wouldn't it just be a better move to resign or step down? After the California governor debacle, seems that the voters would have just cause to recall him. This isn't not paying parking tickets, or for being intoxicated in public which are misdemeanors, it is a felony, and how could he serve his time and his elected duties?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2004, 11:50 AM
AlphaSigOU AlphaSigOU is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Huntsville, Alabama - ahem - Kwaj East!
Posts: 3,710
If DeLay should be convicted and sent to the "hoosegow", then he would have to resign his seat in Congress. Right now the political posturing and rule changing is to make sure he doesn't lose his leadership position in the House.
__________________
ASF
Causa latet vis est notissima - the cause is hidden, the results are well known.

Alpha Alpha (University of Oklahoma) Chapter, #814, 1984
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.