| 
				
				» GC Stats | 
			 
		
		
			
				
	
		
			Members: 331,672 
			Threads: 115,713 
			Posts: 2,207,778 
			
			
		
	 | 
 
	
		| Welcome to our newest member, haeytexaxd8031 | 
	 
			
		
	 
 
			 | 
		
		
			
				
	
		  | 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
				09-15-2000, 11:21 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
				
				 GreekChat Member 
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					Join Date: Sep 1999 
					Location: NY 
					
					
						Posts: 8,594
					 
					
					
					
					
					
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
	
	
		
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				Resolution of MIT Drinking Death
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			This is a large enough settlement to scare administrators from all over the Nation . . . 
 
 
Wednesday September 13 2:39 PM ET 
MIT Agrees To Pay $4.75 Million  
 
By THEO EMERY, Associated Press Writer  
 
BOSTON (AP) - The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has agreed to pay $4.75 million, endow a scholarship and make 
sweeping policy changes in a settlement with the family of a freshman who drank himself to death at a 1997 fraternity initiation, 
the young man's parents say.  
 
Scott Krueger's parents, Bob and Darlene Krueger, said they reached the agreement, announced Wednesday, after two days of 
meetings with MIT President Charles A. Vest. The university had no immediate comment.  
 
In a letter sent to the Kruegers earlier this month, Vest apologized for the 18-year-old student's death.  
 
``The death of Scott as a freshman living in an MIT fraternity shows that our approach to alcohol education and policy, and our 
freshman housing options, were inadequate,'' Vest said.  
 
According to the Kruegers, MIT will pay $4.75 million to the family and establish a $1.25 million sholarship fund in the student's 
memory.  
 
They said the settlement also includes several policy changes, including a requirement that all MIT freshman live in 
university-owned, -operated and -supervised housing as of August 2002. Also, no fraternity and sorority recruiting events will 
be held during freshman orientation, and freshmen will not be allowed to live in fraternities and sororities.  
 
In addition, fraternities and sororities will be required to have resident advisers.  
 
According to the Kruegers, the university also agreed to more strictly enforce rules against underage drinking. The drinking age 
in Massachusetts is 21.  
 
If Vest ``follows through with all of his promises, we feel that MIT will be a better place. And we hope other colleges will follow 
suit,'' Darlene Krueger said.  
 
Krueger decided to join Phi Gamma Delta to obtain housing, his parents said. After a hazing during which he drank large 
amounts of alcohol, he slipped into a coma and died three days later.  
 
Prosecutors charged the fraternity as an organization with manslaughter but were not able to bring it to court. MIT later banished 
the fraternity.  
 
The family never sued MIT but would have if the university hadn't agreed to the settle, according to the Kruegers' attorney, Leo 
V. Boyle.  
 
The Kruegers said they refused any confidential settlement offers.  
 
``We were looking to make people aware of what goes on in the college and to keep it from happening to someone else,'' Bob 
Krueger said. ``We can only try and bring some good out of our son's death.''  
 
After the student's death, two dozen Boston-area colleges and universities - including MIT - pledged in 1998 to control 
underage campus drinking.  
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
			
			
				 
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
				09-15-2000, 11:47 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
				
				 GreekChat Member 
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					Join Date: Sep 1999 
					Location: NY 
					
					
						Posts: 8,594
					 
					
					
					
					
					
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
	
	
		
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Here is a similar situation with a different ruling . . . 
 
Fraternity cleared in death of Garofalo 
 
High court says family can sue 'big brother' 
 
By Brian Sharp 
Iowa City Press-Citizen 
 
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled Thursday that blame for the 1995 alcohol-related 
death of a University of Iowa freshman does not rest with the fraternity 
where he was provided alcohol, nor with one of its members. 
 
But the high court said Matthew Garofalo's parents still could pursue 
legal action against another fraternity member - their son's "big brother" 
at Lambda Chi Alpha; an initiated member assigned to help Garofalo adjust 
to fraternity life. 
 
The ruling came five years to the day after the 19-year-old from Elgin, 
Ill., drank enough alcohol in an hour's time to cause his death the next 
morning. It affirmed an earlier Johnson County District Court ruling, 
striking a painful blow to the family lawsuit. 
 
"This boy is dead," said Garofalo family attorney David Wise, of Chicago. 
"It's just hard to swallow that nobody has done anything wrong." 
 
The high court's majority opinion, written by Chief Justice Arthur A. 
McGiverin, stated: "The district court properly recognized that a fraternity 
is not a custodial institution and its members, as adults, are free to 
make choices about their use and abuse of alcohol. No care-taking function 
is involved." 
 
While consequence for Garofalo's death has yet to be rendered in the 
courtroom, it sparked near immediate, widespread changes in UI alcohol 
policies. And it continues to fuel a community debate today about how 
UI and the City of Iowa City can best curb underage and excessive drinking. 
 
"It's sad that we have to learn from that ... but it is good for people 
to hear," said UI Interfraternity Council President Jason Goslin. "We're 
dry now. I would say (Garofalo's death) is probably the main reason." 
 
But the memory of Garofalo is beginning to fade. Goslin, a senior, arrived 
on campus in 1997 and did not hear about the case until becoming president 
of his Sigma Chi fraternity two years ago. 
 
"I doubt the younger members even know about it," he said. 
 
Garofalo and other pledges were provided alcohol after a "Big Brother/Little 
Brother" ceremony Sept. 7, 1995 at Lamba Chi Alpha. He and two others 
passed out, court records state. Early the next morning, Garofalo's lungs 
filled with vomit, causing his heart to stop. 
 
An autopsy showed a .188 blood-alcohol level - nearly twice the amount 
Iowa law considers too intoxicated to drive. It is estimated he reached 
up to a .300 level during the night. 
 
Garofalo's parents, Edward and Monica Garofalo of Hampshire, Ill., sued 
the fraternity and four fraternity members, including Tim Reier and Chad 
Diehl, in October 1996. Their suit alleged the incident was hazing, with 
pledges encouraged to drink a lot of alcohol quickly. 
 
District Court Judge L. Vern Robinson dismissed Reier from the case in 
August 1998 but left Diehl as a defendant. Robinson said there was evidence 
that Diehl - Garofalo's "big brother" - provided alcohol and assumed 
some responsibility. 
 
Another judge dismissed defendant Brian Garcea, and the Garofalos dropped 
their case against Brian Rinehart. 
 
"What can I say?" asked Edward Gallagher, another Garofalo family attorney 
from Waterloo. "Right now, we'll proceed with the case against Chad Diehl." 
 
Gallagher spoke with Edward and Monica Garofalo about the decision. They 
could not be reached for comment Thursday. 
 
The high court rejected the couple's three-part challenge raised on appeal. 
They argued that a special relationship exists between a fraternity and 
its members, raising the duty of care. Further, the national fraternity 
had a duty to control its local chapter and members. The Garofalos also 
claimed fraternity members failed to care for their son. 
 
But the majority opinion stated, in part: "... the record before us reveals 
no affirmative harm by the Iowa chapter of Lambda Chi Alpha, illegal 
or otherwise, toward Garofalo. The drinking that ultimately led to Garofalo's 
death was not part of any initiation ritual or ceremony." 
 
Wise said the majority opinion ignored peer pressure, the realities of 
being a teenager away from home for the first time and the reason fraternities, 
schools and states enact laws again providing alcohol to people underage. 
 
"We have this in Illinois," Wise said. "We get judges who act as super 
jurors, who want to find a result. They took a lot of issues away from 
a jury that a jury should be deciding." 
 
Justice Louis A. Lavorato was among three of the six ruling justices 
to dissent, in part. 
 
Lavorato argued the fraternity was liable. He relied on the fact that 
Garofalo and 23 other underage pledges were provided alcohol that night. 
Court records show that fraternity functions were strongly tied to alcohol, 
and that serving underage members was common - "in clear violation of 
Iowa law," he wrote. 
 
He continued that Reier and Diehl were the only fraternity members to 
help Garofalo, but that the pair did not do enough under the law. 
 
Indianapolis-based Lambda Chi Alpha suspended its local chapter one month 
after Garofalo's death and has not returned to UI. Tom Helmbock is executive 
vice president for the national fraternity. 
 
"We're happy with the decision. For us, it ends a terrible tragedy," 
he said. "We're just glad the court supported the lower court ruling, 
which we felt strongly about." 
 
UI fraternities voluntarily went dry in the fall of 1998. University 
officials stepped in the next year, ordering changes of their own. UI 
Dean of Students Phillip E. Jones reiterated a policy last month that 
bans alcohol from fraternities, except in the rooms of members 21 and 
older. 
 
According to police records, Greek members' alcohol-related arrest totals 
dropped 5 percent last year, a slight improvement that Jones said must 
be greater next year for UI to avoid taking more stringent action. But 
this is just one campus, Goslin said. 
 
"I think, on a different campus, it is going to happen again," he said, 
"... as sad as that is." 
 
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
			
			
				 
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
 
	
		  | 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	 
	
 
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is Off 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	
	
		
	
	
 
			 |