Quote:
Originally posted by dardenr
I do not agree with themed schools, EXCEPT for vocational schools and schools for the arts.
I think that schools and programs that only focus on Math/Science/Technology are causing inner city kids to be ill prepared in writing skills. If there was a guarantee that they could score well on verbal exams and essay writing, then i'd support them.
Vocational schools are necessary, because many kids aren't cut out for college and need to be strengthened in non-academic areas.
Schools of the arts are tricky....sometimes they can be helpful because they provide direction and skills that regular schools don't have. But sometimes they are also guilty of allowing students with poor writing skills to sneak by.
I do NOT agree with "academic" high schools. If you put all the smart kids in one school, OF COURSE you'll have a 0ne hundred percent graduation rate.
I just eally wish all high schools were truly comprehensive.
|
Shoot, you'll have a serious fit here in New York. All of our high schools fall into various categories:
1. Specialized High Schools (Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Brooklyn Tech) - only the top students get into these schools. Oh yeah, there is a test the students must take to get up into one of these bad boys. Kaplan gives prep courses on how to take the test just like you would for the SAT, GRE, LSAT, etc.
2. Academic - these schools are where the majority of high school students attend. I attended one (Martin L. King) and I turned out OK.
3. Vocational - for those who may not necessarily want to attend college.
4. Alternative - I guess for those who would not fit into the other categories.
Lately, the newest high schools to pop up on the scene are "themed" - Math/Science, Performing Arts (although LaGuardia HS is still the preferred perfoming arts school to attend in NYC - you must audition to get in).
Personally, I don't care how many themes they wanna use, the educational system in NYC is still full of problems.