» GC Stats |
Members: 329,763
Threads: 115,671
Posts: 2,205,242
|
Welcome to our newest member, aanapitt6324 |
|
 |

10-21-2008, 10:58 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Counting my blessings!
Posts: 31,422
|
|
Electoral College Votes
I found this article terribly interesting, as I had always thought that Washington was unanimously elected. It's writeen by Dick Eastman, who writes a genealogical blog, and copied with permission:
"October 20, 2008
270 To Win
"It takes 270 Electoral Votes to win the U.S. Presidential Election. A new web site shows the projected electoral votes for the 2008 election, updated daily as the various public opinion polls release their findings. However, I found the history of electoral votes shown on the site to be much more interesting than today's projections.
"For instance, in the first U.S. national election of 1789, George Washington won 69 electoral votes, John Adams won 34 electoral votes, and 35 electoral votes were cast for various other candidates. If my math is correct, that shows Washington as winning only 50% of the electoral votes.
"Washington didn't fare any better when he ran for reelection in 1792, winning 132 Electoral Votes. Once again, that's 50% of the electoral votes. John Adams gained 77 votes while George Clinton received 50. Five electoral votes were cast for independent candidates in 1792.
"Does the Electoral College system result in America always picking the best candidate? We could argue that forever, but I will point out the 1972 landslide reelection of Richard Nixon seems interesting. Nixon won 96.8% of the electoral votes (520 votes to George McGovern's 17), only to resign a few years later in disgrace.
"The 270ToWin.com site provides statistics as well as maps showing which states voted for each candidate throughout history. This is an interesting site for history buffs. Go to http://www.270towin.com to learn more about American history."
__________________
~ *~"ADPi"~*~
♥Proud to be a Macon Magnolia ♥
"He who is not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
|

10-22-2008, 01:22 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long-distance information, give me Memphis, Tennessee!
Posts: 1,518
|
|
his presidential hairstyle would have been revolutionary
Quote:
Originally Posted by honeychile
Once again, that's 50% of the electoral votes. John Adams gained 77 votes while George Clinton received 50.
|
__________________
Αλφα Σιγμα Ταυ, ψο!Φι Αλφα ΘεταΟρδερ οφ Ομεγαηερε ισ α σεχρετ μεσσαγε ιυστ φορ ψου!
|

10-22-2008, 08:37 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In Mombasa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 896
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by honeychile
John Adams gained 77 votes while George Clinton received 50.
|
We almost had a parliamentary system apparently. And it would have been a very funkadelic parliament I'm sure.
__________________
"I put my mama on her, she threw her in the air. My mama said son, that's a mother buckin' mare."
|

10-22-2008, 08:41 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by honeychile
"For instance, in the first U.S. national election of 1789, George Washington won 69 electoral votes, John Adams won 34 electoral votes, and 35 electoral votes were cast for various other candidates. If my math is correct, that shows Washington as winning only 50% of the electoral votes.
"Washington didn't fare any better when he ran for reelection in 1792, winning 132 Electoral Votes. Once again, that's 50% of the electoral votes. John Adams gained 77 votes while George Clinton received 50. Five electoral votes were cast for independent candidates in 1792.
"Does the Electoral College system result in America always picking the best candidate? We could argue that forever, but I will point out the 1972 landslide reelection of Richard Nixon seems interesting. Nixon won 96.8% of the electoral votes (520 votes to George McGovern's 17), only to resign a few years later in disgrace.
|
Soooooooooooo . . . color me skeptical, but this reads like "Obama might win in a landslide but so did Nixon!!!" propaganda, doesn't it?
|

10-22-2008, 08:51 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
Soooooooooooo . . . color me skeptical, but this reads like "Obama might win in a landslide but so did Nixon!!!" propaganda, doesn't it?
|
Yeah, especially because it ignores the fact that McGovern ran one of the worst campaigns of the 20th century (up there with Dewey punting most of his campaign, and the Dukakis tank/rape question combo).
|

10-22-2008, 11:37 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 1,822
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
Yeah, especially because it ignores the fact that McGovern ran one of the worst campaigns of the 20th century (up there with Dewey punting most of his campaign, and the Dukakis tank/rape question combo).
|
LOL, Dewey, I wish I was there for that election... He was declared the winner long before election day...
|

10-22-2008, 11:44 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.
LOL, Dewey, I wish I was there for that election... He was declared the winner long before election day...
|
And, if I remember the story correctly, essentially didn't start campaigning until about a month before election day, while Truman was an aggressive campaigner throughout.
Is there a book out there on the worst campaigns ever run? I think it would be a good read.
|

10-22-2008, 12:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
And, if I remember the story correctly, essentially didn't start campaigning until about a month before election day, while Truman was an aggressive campaigner throughout.
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|