Saddam's barbaric rape rooms, chemical attacks and torture — those, liberals could live with. But now they want us to send troops to Darfur, a country from which no one anticipates terrorism anytime in the next millennium. If you're looking for a good definition of "no imminent threat," Darfur is it. The climate change "emergency," set to start taking effect sometime during the next century, is a more imminent threat to the United States than Darfur.
These people can't even wrap up genocide. We've been hearing about this slaughter in Darfur forever — and they still haven't finished. The aggressors are moving like termites across that country. It's like genocide by committee. Who's running this holocaust in Darfur, FEMA?
This is truly a war in which we have absolutely no interest. But liberals want our boys to go fight scimitar-wielding dervishes. While the Democrats hold pointless hearings into what George Bush had for breakfast, Republicans should pass a law prohibiting liberals from mentioning Darfur until Horace Mann and Dalton are prepared to put up a battalion.
OMG shut up and go away. Worst sockpuppet ever.
__________________
I'll take trainwreck for 100 Alex.
And Jesus speaketh, "do unto others as they did unto you because the bitches deserve it".
GreekChat Notice: Only those who have chipped in at buymeacoffee.com/greekchat will be able to access the forums when the site goes private. Chip-in what you want. More details on the page linked.
I'd fight for Darfur....the people killing the animals are crusaders/jihadists who won't stop until everyone who doesn't worship like they do is dead, Sudan does not deserve to exist as a sovreign nation-state
Linear Mode
