Clinton on TV

[ann.coulter2]

Questions like these from Larry King on CNN:

Now, the purpose of your initiative overall is to make the world a better place, right? . . .

And the four things it covers is to make the world a better place. . . .

Is it a better place? . . .

How's your health? . . .

The greatest thing you almost did was peace in the Middle East. . . .

or


Question from Chris Wallace on FOX: "Why didn't you do more to put [Osama] bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president?"


So much for the Clinton legacy building - only on CNN in the future.

And it's guaranteed the his wife will never submit to any questions by any Fox person.

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by ann.coulter2

Questions like these from Larry King on CNN:

Now, the purpose of your initiative overall is to make the world a better place, right? . . .

And the four things it covers is to make the world a better place. . . .

Is it a better place? . . .

How's your health? . . .

The greatest thing you almost did was peace in the Middle East. . . .

or


Question from Chris Wallace on FOX: "Why didn't you do more to put [Osama] bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president?"


So much for the Clinton legacy building - only on CNN in the future.

And it's guaranteed the his wife will never submit to any questions by any Fox person.

"Ann" If you are going to provide the question, you should also provide the answer that President Clinton gave.

And what amount has he raised in the first two years of his initative?

Two seperate programs, two seperate issuse.

And I was watching FOX New this aftrernoon, and several panal members defended President Clinton.....

[shinerbock]

by two seperate issues, you must mean A) the issue on Fox, meaning Clinton's inept policy in deterring terrorism and B) the issue on CNN, which tries to bolster his image in order to aid his candidate wife and tarnish the current administration...

[DeltAlum]

I think it's pretty funny to see somebody take off on one of the Wallace boys.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by jon1856

And I was watching FOX New this aftrernoon, and several panal members defended President Clinton.....

Which is interesting, since so many people on this site paint Fox News as being so biased...

Anyway, I hope no one would confuse Larry King with news. His questions are always softballs; that's not a CNN thing, that's a Larry King thing.

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

by two seperate issues, you must mean A) the issue on Fox, meaning Clinton's inept policy in deterring terrorism and B) the issue on CNN, which tries to bolster his image in order to aid his candidate wife and tarnish the current administration...

No, Not at all....

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by KSigkid

Anyway, I hope no one would confuse Larry King with news. His questions are always softballs; that's not a CNN thing, that's a Larry King thing.

Exactly. I figured that's why this thread is in the Entertainment forum rather than the News and Politics Forum.

[kstar]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

by two seperate issues, you must mean A) the issue on Fox, meaning Clinton's inept policy in deterring terrorism and B) the issue on CNN, which tries to bolster his image in order to aid his candidate wife and tarnish the current administration...

Clinton's inept policy? What was it that the military said not too long ago?

Oh yeah, there are more terrorists now than before 11 Sept. Clinton was so inept! His response to the 1995 OKC bombing was swifter and more logical than Bush's response to 11 Sept. I guess if Clinton was inept, Bush is incompetent.

[shinerbock]

Did you seriously just compare the Oklahoma City bombing to 9/11...There sure are a lot of caves in this country to hide in.

[AlphaFrog]

Last time I checked, Timothy McVey was not part of a huge kamikaze Terrorist group, with resources, leaders, and members all over the world. He was one single psycho (even if he was working for a "cause").

[kstar]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

Last time I checked, Timothy McVey was not part of a huge kamikaze Terrorist group, with resources, leaders, and members all over the world. He was one single psycho (even if he was working for a "cause").

Still doesn't changet he fact that Clinton was swift yet catious with his actions, while Bush engaged us in a war we can't win.

Also, Terry Nichols? and the white supremecist militia movement? Did you even pay attention in 1995?

[Sistermadly]

Keith Olbermann on "a textbook definition of cowardice" and the right-wing brouhaha over Clinton's Fox News appearance:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15004160/

Don't just read the transcript - watch the video.

[Munchkin03]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

Last time I checked, Timothy McVey was not part of a huge kamikaze Terrorist group, with resources, leaders, and members all over the world. He was one single psycho (even if he was working for a "cause").

Ummm, Timothy McVeigh was a psycho, but he didn't exactly act alone.

I was just a teenager when that happened--but damn, I remember hearing about Terry Nichols, and there was at least one other person who spent some time in jail for not being exactly forthright with the information that he had.

[shinerbock]

The fact is, attempting to compare capturing 2 guys to overtaking a worldwide terrorist network is simply and utterly stupid. Speaking of Clinton's response, how'd he do on USS Cole? Oh nothing? Oh ok.

As for Keith Olbermann, he's an unabashed liberal, not at all a legitimate journalist. Hell, ESPN wouldn't even take him.

[DeltAlum]

Originally Posted by shinerbock

As for Keith Olbermann, he's an unabashed liberal, not at all a legitimate journalist. Hell, ESPN wouldn't even take him.

Yes, he certainly seems that way. Just as the president of, and many of the people on, FOX are unabashed conservatives.

In many cases, we aren't talking about journalists anymore, but rather personalities.

On both sides of the video aisle.