» GC Stats |
Members: 329,729
Threads: 115,666
Posts: 2,205,013
|
Welcome to our newest member, samuelpetrvoz32 |
|
 |
|

09-04-2009, 09:50 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
|
|
Parents and lawmakers speak out against Obama's speech to students
Some of the comments (from both sides) are really out there.
Link
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
|

09-04-2009, 10:14 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
|
|
I'm upset that he was giving another speech. Poor kids.
|

09-04-2009, 10:17 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
|
|
if kids do as most kids do, they will tune out any way.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
|

09-04-2009, 10:46 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
if kids do as most kids do, they will tune out any way.
|
Crazy kids with their video game systems, and their backwards hats, and their rock music...
*shakes fist at youth of America*
|

09-04-2009, 10:53 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
Crazy kids with their video game systems, and their backwards hats, and their rock music...
*shakes fist at youth of America*
|
You forgot about the droopy pants.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
|

09-04-2009, 11:13 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,724
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
Some of the comments (from both sides) are really out there.
Link
|
I agree. I think the comments have been taken to a ridiculous/shameful level on both sides.
|

09-04-2009, 11:44 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
|
|
What's even worse, when reading some of the comments, it seems that some of the writers need to be in class with the kids.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
|

09-04-2009, 12:40 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,724
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
What's even worse, when reading some of the comments, it seems that some of the writers need to be in class with the kids.
|
lol yeah!
|

09-04-2009, 09:05 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,372
|
|
Yep. This has been bizarre. I think it needed to be planned and thought out a little better before it was introduced since there hasn't been one since 1991.
It seems to me that we're at an intensely polarized point politically, so it wouldn't have been asking too much for the Obama administration to have reflected on the idea of how it would be perceived before they unveiled the plan for the speech AND to have worked more closely with the lesson planners at the DOE so the first set of lesson plans that the talk radio and TV personalities latched onto didn't contain anything that could seem like indoctrination through the schools.
On the other hand, this has been one of the worst topics for misinformation I've ever seen from the usual right wing suspects. The topic of the speech isn't controversial. There is no honorable opposition to the idea that kids should set goals and value their educational opportunities. It shouldn't be fundamentally threatening for the President to address school kids.
On final note as a teacher: the administration really needed to get the word out much earlier than they did. Almost any teacher could have worked some aspect of the speech into his or her curriculum had the teacher been given advanced notice. If you just publicize something the week before though, most teachers will have lessons planned already. Unless they can really justify dropping the instruction planned, you aren't going to get the participation you hope for.
Similarly, noon on the east coast as the time makes it pretty hard logistically for all the kids at any east coast school to watch it since it's going to be right in the middle of lunch, probably. At a small school where everyone eats at the same time, it's easy to move things around or even to have the kids watch while they eat. But anyplace big enough that they have multiple lunch periods, this is going to be really hard.
(And if the solution is to Tivo or record for broadcast later, why did it need to be during the school day anyway? Obama could have sent out tapes or video streaming to make available for teachers to use at their discretion.)
|

09-05-2009, 09:33 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
Yep. This has been bizarre. I think it needed to be planned and thought out a little better before it was introduced since there hasn't been one since 1991.
It seems to me that we're at an intensely polarized point politically, so it wouldn't have been asking too much for the Obama administration to have reflected on the idea of how it would be perceived before they unveiled the plan for the speech AND to have worked more closely with the lesson planners at the DOE so the first set of lesson plans that the talk radio and TV personalities latched onto didn't contain anything that could seem like indoctrination through the schools.
On the other hand, this has been one of the worst topics for misinformation I've ever seen from the usual right wing suspects. The topic of the speech isn't controversial. There is no honorable opposition to the idea that kids should set goals and value their educational opportunities. It shouldn't be fundamentally threatening for the President to address school kids.
On final note as a teacher: the administration really needed to get the word out much earlier than they did. Almost any teacher could have worked some aspect of the speech into his or her curriculum had the teacher been given advanced notice. If you just publicize something the week before though, most teachers will have lessons planned already. Unless they can really justify dropping the instruction planned, you aren't going to get the participation you hope for.
Similarly, noon on the east coast as the time makes it pretty hard logistically for all the kids at any east coast school to watch it since it's going to be right in the middle of lunch, probably. At a small school where everyone eats at the same time, it's easy to move things around or even to have the kids watch while they eat. But anyplace big enough that they have multiple lunch periods, this is going to be really hard.
(And if the solution is to Tivo or record for broadcast later, why did it need to be during the school day anyway? Obama could have sent out tapes or video streaming to make available for teachers to use at their discretion.)
|
I think it would have been tough for the administration and DOE to really do any effective spin control prior to the speech, for some of the reasons you mentioned. Things are VERY polarized right now, and I think you would have heard many, if not most, of the same complaints no matter the amount of preperation.
The timing issue is a good point. In many schools you're going to miss at least 1/3 of the kids, and depending on the size of the school and the facilities, you might not even be able to get a television into the cafeteria. The smart thing would be to make free copies of the speech available on tape and DVD. They could even work it into some interactive research project on computers, depending on the actual text of the speech. I would hope the DOE and administration had planned for that.
I'll also agree that some of the comments from both sides have been pretty scary. The false information and stereotyping that has been coming from both parties is pretty crazy stuff. You see some of it here on Greekchat, I've seen a bunch on Facebook, and it just seems to blow up in places like the comments section of the cited story.
|

09-05-2009, 11:37 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western suburbs of Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,038
|
|
My old school district is not showing it at all, and that makes me very sad.
__________________
Alpha Phi Omega- Mu Chapter
Chicagoland Area Alumni Association
|

09-06-2009, 10:53 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
It seems to me that we're at an intensely polarized point politically, so it wouldn't have been asking too much for the Obama administration to have reflected on the idea of how it would be perceived before they unveiled the plan for the speech AND to have worked more closely with the lesson planners at the DOE so the first set of lesson plans that the talk radio and TV personalities latched onto didn't contain anything that could seem like indoctrination through the schools.
On the other hand, this has been one of the worst topics for misinformation I've ever seen from the usual right wing suspects. The topic of the speech isn't controversial. There is no honorable opposition to the idea that kids should set goals and value their educational opportunities. It shouldn't be fundamentally threatening for the President to address school kids.
On final note as a teacher: the administration really needed to get the word out much earlier than they did. Almost any teacher could have worked some aspect of the speech into his or her curriculum had the teacher been given advanced notice. If you just publicize something the week before though, most teachers will have lessons planned already. Unless they can really justify dropping the instruction planned, you aren't going to get the participation you hope for.
Similarly, noon on the east coast as the time makes it pretty hard logistically for all the kids at any east coast school to watch it since it's going to be right in the middle of lunch, probably. At a small school where everyone eats at the same time, it's easy to move things around or even to have the kids watch while they eat. But anyplace big enough that they have multiple lunch periods, this is going to be really hard.
(And if the solution is to Tivo or record for broadcast later, why did it need to be during the school day anyway? Obama could have sent out tapes or video streaming to make available for teachers to use at their discretion.)
|
I agree that there is nothing fundamentally threatening about the topic of the President's speech. However I disagree about teachers needing that much advance notice. Part of being a good teacher is being flexible. There may be days when your lesson plan won't go according to "plan." A teacher should always be prepared for that. Furthermore, with the way things happen in schools nowadays teachers should be prepared for unannounced interruptions (fire drills, bomb drills, sudden visits from dignitaries). When Chief Justice Roberts interrupted my Torts class the professor was mildly taken aback but he wasn't going to tell Roberts he couldn't come in because he didn't have time to incorporate it into the lesson plan. And besides, based on the topic of the speech, what would be so difficult about incorporating it into a lesson plan?
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
|

09-06-2009, 11:44 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,372
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2
I agree that there is nothing fundamentally threatening about the topic of the President's speech. However I disagree about teachers needing that much advance notice. Part of being a good teacher is being flexible. There may be days when your lesson plan won't go according to "plan." A teacher should always be prepared for that. Furthermore, with the way things happen in schools nowadays teachers should be prepared for unannounced interruptions (fire drills, bomb drills, sudden visits from dignitaries). When Chief Justice Roberts interrupted my Torts class the professor was mildly taken aback but he wasn't going to tell Roberts he couldn't come in because he didn't have time to incorporate it into the lesson plan. And besides, based on the topic of the speech, what would be so difficult about incorporating it into a lesson plan?
|
The difference is that Obama could have easily given more advance notice. It didn't need to sprung on people the week before.
And I don't know what your education was like, but a generic "stay in school, kids" wasn't part of my lessons very frequently.
There are a lot of ways the logistics could have been a lot better to get closer to 100% participation.
Think about it: if this had been well-planned and the specific content explained by the White House or DOE a month or two ago, there'd be pressure on districts to figure out how to show it. Instead, I suspect that the participation rate for any state that this isn't the first day of school will be far from 100%.
If this is the first day for a district, they had all last week to work out how and where they would show it. If it wasn't the first week, they were actually teaching, planning, grading, dealing with discipline, and probably didn't have as much time to devote to this. I know my district didn't. I think most of the districts around Atlanta figured out how to handle it in a way that didn't make parents mad; permission slip etc, but didn't send out any information about how to make it work with the lunch schedule or any of the practical concerns if a teacher wanted to show it. That will leave many teachers with the impression that it's much easier just not to fool with showing it.
Last edited by UGAalum94; 09-06-2009 at 11:47 AM.
|

09-05-2009, 12:43 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere, PA
Posts: 199
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
What's even worse, when reading some of the comments, it seems that some of the writers need to be in class with the kids.
|
Just found this gem of a comment:
school is to learn not to listen to the president give a speech. i belive that it is not appropriate for this to be shown in schools. my daughter will not be watching this video. i do not send my daughter to school to watch videos all day long I SEND MY DAUGHTER TO SCHOOL TO LEARN. i belive as some others have stated that pre-k-5th grades should carry on with learning and not this pointless video. it should be the parents encouraging there kids NOT THE PRESIDENT. as one other quoted he isnt payng child support for our kids.(  no...but he runs your government....) i feel as though president obama should get a brain and quit trying to tell our kids what to do. LET OUR KIDS MAKE UP THERE MINDS. LEAVE THE PARENTING OF OUR KIDS TO US. PRESIDENT OBAMA NEEDS TO WORRY ABOUT HIS OWN DAUGHTERS EDUCATION. PRESIDENT OBAMA OUR KIDS ARE WHO THEY CHOOSE TO BE NOT WHAT YOU MAKE THEM!
So many things wrong with this..the spelling kills me, but has this idiot never heard of a comma or apostrophe? Apparently not, but she still thinks she's smarter than the President of USA. Hmph.
__________________
ΔΣΠ
AΦ
"If you find the girls that love the you, you love..well then that's just fAbulΦus."
|

09-06-2009, 10:24 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NJ/Philly suburbs
Posts: 7,172
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by court4short
Just found this gem of a comment:
So many things wrong with this..the spelling kills me, but has this idiot never heard of a comma or apostrophe? Apparently not, but she still thinks she's smarter than the President of USA. Hmph.
|
yup, she should be sitting in the class with her kids, because someone failed her dumb behind! It could be worse...she could have committed horrible apostrophe abuse--you know, thinking the apostrophe makes stuff plural.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|