Does size necessarily equate quality?
I was reading a few threads, and I dont know if this was discussed before, but what does everyone think about size equating "quality" of the chapter? For instance, can a house be a "top chapter" and have outstanding women, but be lower in numbers than other houses? Or do you think a house that has the most women just has "better" women, and the other houses have less because there's something "wrong?"
Note: this isnt meant to be a flame thread, nor to disrespect houses that aren't a "top house." But obviously there is campus opinion on which houses are "better."
and I use quotes because i DONT think the quality of women is based on size-- i think the size is based more on reputation of the house on campus over the women who actually make up the house-- a reputation which may or may not be based on reality.
__________________
AXO
|