Bias from administration. help.

[archangel689]

--

[33girl]

Their membership numbers have zero to do with anything. There's only one question to ask: was the fraternity voted out of IFC by the other IFC members?

If they weren't, you have no case. They do sound like jerks, but you can't prevent them from operating if they weren't voted out or placed on probation.

[archangel689]

I presume it would be 2/3rds to remove because anything having to do with membership is 2/3rds.

One could deduce from what you've stated that a fraternity with zero members could still be a member... hmm...

It is possible we could trash the whole argument about voting them IN, and just expell them instead.

Originally posted by 33girl
Their membership numbers have zero to do with anything. There's only one question to ask: was the fraternity voted out of IFC by the other IFC members?

If they weren't, you have no case. They do sound like jerks, but you can't prevent them from operating if they weren't voted out or placed on probation.

[Kevin]

But if you bring up a vote to expel them and it doesn't get 2/3 you've admitted that they do exist...

Why would this group even be interested in being part of IFC? They don't seem to be interested in working for the betterment of the system.

[Kevin]

Originally posted by archangel689
Acceptance I guess, they're endorced by a national, I think they have to be in the IFC. And why would we bring it up for vote if we didnt talk to everyone indivdually beforehand to see if they would vote in favor of expulsion.

Some groups do not require that. TKE I'm certain doesn't. They exist on our campus.. or rather at our school. Neither the University or IFC recognize them. They're good guys from what I know of them (which is very little).

Sounds like ya'll have your mind made up about them. It's just typically so tough to get a 2/3 vote in IFC. It's usually split around 50/50 or so (at least in my experience).

Good luck with this. I'm sure ya'll will make the best decision.