» GC Stats |
Members: 329,679
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,898
|
Welcome to our newest member, zcharestopz1918 |
|
 |
|

12-07-2000, 09:38 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Findlay, OH
Posts: 7
|
|
Alcohol Free Housing
Does anyone know anything about Alcohol Free Housing?
|

12-07-2000, 10:23 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Slogging through a swamp.
Posts: 3,452
|
|
What do you want to know? All NPC sorority houses are alcohol free and have been since day one. Farmhouse Fraternity has already been dry and Sigma Nu and a few other groups have gone dry way in advance of the Dry by 2002 campaign.
For most groups, alcohol-free housing means no alcohol in the public areas of the house. Individual, of-age members may keep alcohol for personal consumption in their rooms, if that is the ruling of their particular fraternity.
|

12-07-2000, 04:44 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Findlay, OH
Posts: 7
|
|
Sorry to be more specific what does anyone think about Alcohol free Housing?
|

12-07-2000, 09:52 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,518
|
|
I think it does very little to take the emphasis off alcohol - it's just a different emphasis. The numerous initiatives are meant to take your mind off alcohol, but I think the endless discussion just makes you think about it more. (Kind of like when your mom says "Don't scratch your chicken pox!" every half hour.  )
Also, if fraternities who permit alcohol for of-age members' personal use in bedrooms and such are considered "dry", the sororities should also use that classification of "dry." It's ridiculous that a 21 year old sorority woman is not permitted to have a glass of beer or wine in her room. Stick a fork in the double standard already, it's done!!!
|

12-07-2000, 10:57 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Hi 33girl,
As a point of clarification..at least in Delta Tau Delta we offer our chapters three options...
"Dry" is just what it sounds like. No alcohol in the house.
"Wet" is that you can have alcohol in the house as long as you obey the law, and university regulations.
"Damp" is what you describe above. Of age members can have alcohol in their rooms, but no alcohol is allowed in the public areas of the house.
In reality, we are discovering that more and more often a university demands "dry" housing before they will allow us to colonize or recolonize. That takes the choice out of our hands or the chapters.
Obviously, I can't speak for other fraternities.
DeltAlum
|

12-07-2000, 11:35 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,518
|
|
Delt Alum -
Of course if the university says no alcohol anywhere, you have to go along with what they say. Our sororities used to have on-campus suites and since the campus was dry, those had to be dry.
But you do have the options available which I think is a good idea. As far as I know, most sororities do not.
|

01-17-2001, 06:00 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 4,065
|
|
I just was through a weekend of Alcohol Free Housing Education. What a time! Apparently at U of Miami, they do this, and it works great! In the long run, I think this will hurt rural schools who don't have 3rd party vendors to mix at.
Does anyone attend a rural school that has this policy already in effect? Are the groups following it?
|

02-13-2001, 03:23 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 168
|
|
I am from a rural area in Wisconsin which has this policy in place for all sororities already. Actually our policy states that no sorority may hold a social event with a fraternity that has alcohol without a third party vendor. And... actually, we just find ways around it, no offense to those who feel a strong conviction to the new NPC resolution.
|

02-13-2001, 08:13 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 764
|
|
I think the entire issue is hard to swallow if your school is used to breaking the rules. But if you really look at what our national policies and the NPC resolution is trying to do then you would realize it is helping us keep our members, chapters and organizations safe.
We can still have a good time, we just cannot advertise the place or organize an event. I think it may be hard at some schools with no thrid party vendors, but at ECU we have tons of options and still have problems following any policy beacuse it is a change for all of us. I think it will take time and a little understanding from our national organizations and each chapter. Things have to change, we have to deal and move on.
|

02-13-2001, 09:01 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 4,065
|
|
I just did a workshop on this, introducing our new policy to our collegians at a regional leadership conference. We were expecting to have some real backlash and anger, but surprisingly, they collegians were for the policy for the most part. A lot of schools have stuff in place already. I was so proud of our women for being open-minded and ready for the challenge of this new policy. I'd be naive to think that everyone was going to follow it, but I think that many will try.
|

02-15-2001, 06:12 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 168
|
|
I guess what I should have mentioned also, is that at my university, it was a little more complicated than that. We have three sororities, two of which are national, and mine which is local. When it came time for our Panhellenic Council to write and vote on the new resolution, it was especially difficult for my sorority. We are a self-governed sorority and have been so for 103 years. Change is something that comes difficult to all fraternities and sororities, as we are based on tradition. But it comes especially hard to local chapters, which aren't used to having to follow what the other chapters do. The resolution did pass, as the national chapters HAD to vote yes, which left my sorority with a lot of upset members. I was in a tough position myself, as I am on the Panhellenic Council, and helped to create to resolution... and to pass it.
|

02-15-2001, 11:42 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 8,594
|
|
I believe that the first priority of any national organization is to avoid liability.
These organizations function as businesses and have to stay both in business and solvent.
It is difficult to legislate behavior. So generally if people want to violate rules such as where and when they can drink they generally will.
Therfore it makes me wonder if these rules increase safety to any significant degree.
Because even if people obey the change in rules such as no drinking in a house, they actually increase their risk by driving off campus somewhere . . . a predictable result that gives the lie that its a rule being used to promote safety.
Unless national officers are completely short sighted.
However, if you break the new rule it diminishes their liability and makes it less likely they will have to pay out money.
|

02-16-2001, 10:38 AM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 4,065
|
|
James--
Most places where this initiative is in effect, chapters realize the dangers of drunk driving and implement one of two programs.
1. Sober sisters who are not allowed to drink and will drive home.
2. On a campus where NPC has passed the resolution, the organizations make deals with bus companies to get a reduced rate for a bus, and use that as transportation.
I think your point that is most important is that chapters who choose to break policy also choose to forfeit their right to most, if not all, insurance coverage from the national organization.
Because even if people obey the change in rules such as no drinking in a house, they actually increase their risk by driving off campus somewhere . . . a predictable result that gives the lie that its a rule being used to promote safety.
[/QUOTE]
|

03-07-2001, 10:24 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Columbia, MO, USA
Posts: 15
|
|
On my campus, in the past, all sororities were dry, but not fraternities. This year the whole campus went dry. "Dry 2000"
There are still parties off campus with third party venders, but it's not the same. I visit friends from other schools, and have so much fun at greek parties.
Greek parties at my school are fun too, but we don't have them as often, and they cost a lot more. (buses, facilities, alcohol providers, etc.)
Most houses I've been to still drink and stuff, but they can't have huge parties. We used to be one of the top 10 party schools too.
|

05-31-2001, 05:47 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 41
|
|
I personally think alcohol free housing is kind of stupid because no matter what, the chapter will find a way to drink somewhere else or near the house. I hang out at a fraternity house that is dry and they would find ways where it was possible for them to drink. I've seen them drink in front of the house (on the sidewalk), in a car near the house or I've seen some sneek hard alcohol or mixed drinks into the house through pretending that their only "drinking coke or pepsi." No matter what they will find a way, whether or not there is a rule, just as long as they do not get caught.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|