Third-Party Providers and Wet Social Policies

[kddani]

Ummmm.... State College isn't exactly a tiny little town. There are plenty of options, plenty of 3rd party vendors. State College has more options than MANY MANY schools that are located in very small towns or very conservative towns- for example, Westminster. So that reasoning is 100% pure bull. Even if there weren't many options for 3rd party vendors, that's not going to cause any HQ to overlook an NPC rule- rules that would VOID your insurance policies, and subject them to possibly millions of dollars in liability.

Aphidancer03, what gives you the right to speak for the women of another sorority? Do you want them speaking for you? Sounds like a lot of hearsay to me. Maybe you should keep your nose in your own business, don't you think?

PM_Mama, I wouldn't take what she says too seriously, as she's not even a member of Phi Mu and is likely just sh!ttalking.

Actually, instead of your national officers, I would think Alpha Phi's would be much more interested in knowing one of their chapters is "special" and doesn't have to follow the rules. I'm sure it's news to them.

ETA: The third party vendor rule has been around for quite awhile- when was that passed-2000, I think?

And on an interstate rivalry note: Again, another example of someone thinking State College is some magical wonderland.