» GC Stats |
Members: 329,576
Threads: 115,662
Posts: 2,204,628
|
Welcome to our newest member, samueltop4152 |
|
 |

02-14-2005, 07:19 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ya man's a headache, I'll be ya aspirin
Posts: 5,298
|
|
Grammar Question
I need someone to settle a debate I am having with a friend.
Whats the proper useage of the words historic and historical? I do not believe they are interchangeable. I am not sure what the proper use of each is, but I dont think they are interchangeable.
Help is appreciated.
|

02-14-2005, 07:41 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
|
|
"Historic and historical have different usages, though their senses overlap. Historic refers to what is important in history: the historic first voyage to the moon. It is also used of what is famous or interesting because of its association with persons or events in history: a historic house. Historical refers to whatever existed in the past, whether regarded as important or not: a minor historical character. Historical also refers to anything concerned with history or the study of the past: a historical novel; historical discoveries. While these distinctions are useful, these words are often used interchangeably, as in historic times or historical times."
-Rudey
|

02-15-2005, 02:24 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,571
|
|
|

02-15-2005, 07:29 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,783
|
|
I learned something new today.
|

02-15-2005, 04:16 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Pretty good explaination, Rudey.
Never really gave that any thought.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

02-15-2005, 07:48 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
Oh My, Rudey, You can be amazing when You want to Be!
lifesaver at least you said Historical instead of Hysterical!!!!
Thanks R for the update!!!!!
Am I of Historical or Hysterical proportations!
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|

02-15-2005, 08:18 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Beyond
Posts: 5,092
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rudey
"Historic and historical have different usages, though their senses overlap. Historic refers to what is important in history: the historic first voyage to the moon. It is also used of what is famous or interesting because of its association with persons or events in history: a historic house. Historical refers to whatever existed in the past, whether regarded as important or not: a minor historical character. Historical also refers to anything concerned with history or the study of the past: a historical novel; historical discoveries. While these distinctions are useful, these words are often used interchangeably, as in historic times or historical times."
-Rudey
|
WOW  Rudey,
You amaze me with your talents!!!
And Phrat Senusret I... I just learned something new today, too...
__________________
We thank and pledge Alpha Kappa Alpha to remember...
"I'm watching with a new service that translates 'stupid-to-English'" ~ @Shoq of ShoqValue.com 1 of my Tweeple
"Yo soy una mujer negra" ~Zoe Saldana
|

02-15-2005, 08:26 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,259
|
|
Now I have a grammar-based reason to want to throttle people when they talk about "historical preservation."
|

02-16-2005, 03:26 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ya man's a headache, I'll be ya aspirin
Posts: 5,298
|
|
I asked because someone spoke of the chartering this past weekend as "you will long remember this historical event." And it really caught my attention as the incorrect usage of the word. I didnt know exactly how it was wrong, I just know it didnt sound right.
Now I know why. The chartering ceremony wasnt historical because it wasnt being studied and it wasnt in the past. It was historic because it is important in the context of the orgs. history.
I think...
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|