Twins stump paternity test..

DGqueen17 · #1 11-29-2004, 01:45 PM

twins

Holy shit that is crazy.

Snaps to that chick for nailing twins tho.

cashmoney · #2 11-29-2004, 01:52 PM

Link doesnt work.

DGqueen17 · #3 11-29-2004, 01:57 PM

Works perfectly fine for me.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...361255,00.html

James · #4 11-29-2004, 02:05 PM

I wonder if she ever got tag-teamed by both twins at the same time? Now thats hot . . .

I keep thinking of the doublemint song: " . . .double the pleasure, double the fun . . ."

Sounds almost like she has more of crush ont he twin that got away or something . . . so she uses the amiguity to keep him in her life.

BabyBlue91 · #5 11-29-2004, 02:05 PM

This happened years ago on the Jenny Jones show. The potential fathers were identical twins, and the company that performed the test (I think their vendor of choice was Identigene) was unable to determine which twin was the father because of their identical DNA.

#6 11-29-2004, 02:13 PM

Sounds like a good episode of Springer

AznSAE · #7 11-29-2004, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ADPiZXalum
Sounds like a good episode of Springer

nah.....this would be great on the maury show. he is always doing a "who's the baby's daddy" show.

DeltaSigStan · #8 11-29-2004, 04:58 PM

HAHAHA I thought this would be a great maury topic when I read this too......

DGqueen17 · #9 11-29-2004, 09:24 PM

Seriously that girl is a pimp. Twins?? Too bad she had to get knocked up tho.

sageofages · #10 11-29-2004, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DGqueen17
Seriously that girl is a pimp. Twins?? Too bad she had to get knocked up tho.

She maybe a bit of a slut...but that baby deserves a father who WANTS to support it. She is using the "I did it with both brothers" to keep the defacto father from contact with the child. She even refused support to keep the contact severed.

I think a judge should award BOTH brothers custody and visitation over her objections. Since parternity can be established to the 99% standard on BOTH men, they should both get an opportunity to be award custody. If one wants to surrender his paternal rights at that point, the judge should allow it. The woman should not be permitted to block the child's right to a father or paternal support. It is the child's right NOT hers.

DGqueen17 · #11 11-29-2004, 09:45 PM

I think the brother that wants to be the kid's father should get the visitation. The other brother obviously wants nothing to do with it.

I hate it when the dad actually wants to see the child and the mother refuses because so often the father doesn't want to be involved.

James · #12 11-29-2004, 10:53 PM

Yes, but that would open noth "fathers" up to child support if she decided to sue them for it later.

Quote:

Originally posted by sageofages
She maybe a bit of a slut...but that baby deserves a father who WANTS to support it. She is using the "I did it with both brothers" to keep the defacto father from contact with the child. She even refused support to keep the contact severed.

I think a judge should award BOTH brothers custody and visitation over her objections. Since parternity can be established to the 99% standard on BOTH men, they should both get an opportunity to be award custody. If one wants to surrender his paternal rights at that point, the judge should allow it. The woman should not be permitted to block the child's right to a father or paternal support. It is the child's right NOT hers.

honeychile · #13 11-29-2004, 11:00 PM

IMHO, one of the few obligations that every woman has - except in the case of rape - is to know WHO is the father of her child. Stories like this just bring the scum to the surface.

sageofages · #14 11-30-2004, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by James
Yes, but that would open noth "fathers" up to child support if she decided to sue them for it later.

ONE of the men has been having visitation and paying support all along. She suddenly brings this up because she wants to severe contact with the "father" of record.

She is wrong to deprive the child of a father that wants to be in his life.

James · #15 11-30-2004, 12:23 PM

I don't want to dispute you but i read the article and got a different meaning.

The father of record (birth certificate) is the married twin, the twin that has been acting as a parent is not on the birth certificate, which is causing all the problems.

Quote:

One of the twins, who cannot be named for legal reasons, went to court last summer in the hope of forcing the mother to grant him access to the child. Although his name is not on the birth certificate, he claims he is the only father the boy has known, cared for him every other weekend, provided financial support and was even known to him as 'papa'.

So if both twins were considered joint fathers, the one on the birth certificate would be liable for child support if she chose to ask for it.

Quote:

Originally posted by sageofages
ONE of the men has been having visitation and paying support all along. She suddenly brings this up because she wants to severe contact with the "father" of record.

She is wrong to deprive the child of a father that wants to be in his life.