Hazing is a fast-growing cancer that's very hard to root out.
There's always a "we went thru it, they have to go thru it
too" attitude. Much goes on in LXA that INT HQ doesn't
know about...that's why they seem to "over-react" when
there is a hint of it. Usually, though maybe not in your
chapter, if they see a "little something", its just the tip
of the iceberg.
Actually its amazing how quickly hazing can "crop up" and
grow. This happened long ago, so I guess it's OK to
mention it now:
At the time LXA started its colony at Vandy, it was the
first time in almost 50 years that a new fraternity was
allowed to come on campus. Vandy's frats had a very
very serious hazing problem at the time, and LXA's
no hazing policy and AM program was a major reason
some in Vandy's admin allowed LXA to colonize. It was
hoped by some that LXA would become an example for
the others.
The anti-hazing was a major factor in attracting the
"founding fathers." LXA was a new group on a very
traditional campus, and would be the only fraternity
without a house (that was a condition of colonization...
the chapter and HQ would not ask for a house).
So why would anyone join a new group in that
situation?? The emphasis on anti-hazing was one.
So the "founding fathers" were strongly anti-hazing.
Some turned down bids from other strong groups to
join the new group.
But as usually happens with a brand new colony, INT HQ
put an alumni advisory board in charge, made up of alums
from other chapters (obviously). In the beginning this
was a large group....15-20 alums at each meeting.
But many of the alums wanted to institute so-called
"baby hazing" in the new chapter, ideas they brought
from their chapter. Most wanted to make the new chapter
"in the image" of theirs. There was nothing "major" they
wanted to do....put a "pledge" in an (unplugged) oven
was the worst I heard. Making them carry purple coconuts
was a pretty typical suggestion. Treating the new AMs
like they were in boot camp might best describe what they
wanted to do (yelling, cleaning, etc).
Obviously the undergrad officers didn't want any of this,
being the ones who wanted to join a non-hazing fraternity,
but INT HQ had put these alums "in charge", and the
alums would always say "I've been a LX for years,
none of the actives has been one for more than a
couple of months. we know what we're doing...shut
up and do what you're told" kinda attitude.
The "founding fathers" obviously received NO hazing.
Many were only AMs for a few days, some for only
a couple of hours (AM ceremony at 4:00, initiation
started a few hours later).
The first AM class, a small one at 5or 6, went thru an AM
period basically ran by the alums. "Baby hazing" was
used. After initiation, these guys couldn't wait for next
semester when they could "baby haze" the new group.
It was telling...the attitude difference between the
founding fathers and the first AM class.
That's when the officers finally realize they had to put
a stop to it before more members came in being hazed
and therefore being in favor of hazing later. Eventually
most of the alums were "run off", but by then, the
colony was operating on its own. Everything turned
out great in the end.
But it really made it obvious to me how easily hazing
can crop up, and how those who were hazed, "baby"
or otherwise, WILL have an attitude in favor of hazing.
Disaster occurs as "hazing creep" over the years sets
in. What you think is "just a little fun" this year can turn into
beatings, forced drinking, etc. in just a few years.
So may your guys and HQ can just give each other
a break!