International Conspiracy Theories

[PhiPsiRuss]

Trilateral Commision, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg...

What do people think?

[AlphaSigOU]

Originally posted by russellwarshay
Trilateral Commision, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg...

What do people think?

Guess we Freemasons don't count in the quest for world domination either... (According to some conspiracists, that is...)

[PhiPsiRuss]

Originally posted by AlphaSigOU
Guess we Freemasons don't count in the quest for world domination either... (According to some conspiracists, that is...)

Of course you count. Especially if you have some dirt to tell us.

[AlphaSigOU]

Originally posted by russellwarshay
Of course you count. Especially if you have some dirt to tell us.

Now if I told ya... I'd hafta kill ya, right?

[justamom]

Testimony given by Norman Dodd-
http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache...hl=en&ie=UTF-8

excerpt----"To make a long story short – as short as possible – a member of my staff was sent to New York and spent two weeks there, and did what they call "spot reading" of the minutes of this organization.

Now, we are back in the period of 1908, and these minutes reported the following: The Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment bring up a single question; namely, if it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more efficient than war to gain that end? And they discuss this question at a very high academic and scholarly level for a year, and they come up with an answer-- there are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people.

That leads, then, to a question: How do we involve the United States in a war?

This was in 1909. I doubt if there was any question more removed, or any idea more removed from the minds of us, as a people, at that time than war. There were certain of what we call "intermittent shows" in the Balkans, and I also doubt if very many of us knew, really, where the Balkans was, or their relation or possible effect on us.

We jump, then, to the time when we are in a war, and these Trustees. . . oh, before that, the Trustees then answered the question of how to involve us in a war by saying, "We must control the diplomatic machinery of the United States"; and then that brings up the question of how to secure that control, and the answer is we must control the State Department.

Now, at that point, research discloses a relationship between the effort to control the State Department and an entity which the Carnegie Endowment set up – namely, the Council of Learned Societies. And through that entity are cleared all of the appointments – high appointments in the State Department, and they have continued to be cleared that way since then.

Now, finally, we are in a war. Eventually, the war is over, and the Trustees turn their attention, then, to seeing to it that life does not revert in this country to what it was prior to 1914; and they hit upon the idea that in order to prevent that reversion, they must control education in this country. They realized that that is a perfectly tremendous, really stupendous and complex task – much too great for them alone. So they approached the Rockefeller Foundation, with the suggestion that the task be divided between the two of them."

Though not a blood relative, close association-
This is a part of an obit in The Seattle Daily Times, in 1903
"Venerable Jurist and Pioneer of Seattle Died at Noon Today."
Near the end..."XXXXXX-was not a member of any secret society. Neither had he associated himself with any church." Now WHY would you put that in an obit?
Two reasons pop out initially-either you were and you didn't want it known or you weren't and you didn't want people speculating.
This is a random example from 1909 "Mr.xxxxxx is not a member of any secret societies, but belongs to the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers"

[justamom]

http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/Se...0Societies.htm

I do NOT suggest that any of this is verifiable. Just food for thought.
_____________________________
This is what OWO is about. Don't you see what's happening in our own backyard? Doesn't this all sound a little TOO familiar?

Purpose of the committee of 300
"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, popula- tion will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national bound- aries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Gov- ernment will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited. Only one religion will be allowed and that will be in the form of a One World Government Church, which has been in

existence since 1920 as we shall see. Satanism, Luciferianism and Witchcraft shall be recognized as legitimate One World Government curricula with no private or church schools. All Christian churches have already been subverted and Christian- ity will be a thing of the past in the One World Government. To induce a state where there is no individual freedom or any concept of liberty surviving, there shall be no such thing as republicanism, sovereignty or rights residing with the people. National pride and racial identity shall be stamped out and in the transition phase it shall be subject to severe penalties to even mention one's racial origin.

[DeltAlum]

I've seen black helicopters.

As the man said, "Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you."

[justamom]

For the sake of discussion, I do believe the concept of One world Govt. is very real. The UN, to me, symbolizes the effort to achieve a one world "police" force-judge and jury. I think back upon them wanting that marine to wear the UN insignia. If I recall, when he refused they wanted to lock him up. Whatever happened on that?

The past and current efforts to get ALL Christian symbols removed
yet OK to have the Koran and other symbols visible-Winter Holidays not Christmas... If they can break Christianity the rest will be quite an easy task.

The hang-up most probably have though, is different factions wanting different things that APPEAR to be in conflict with each other. Like Russell mentioned in the other thread. It makes it difficult to believe that in the end, it's all the same agenda.

I don't think that type of "perfection" can be achieved when Americans refuse to even adopt the metric system! Maybe I am way off, but the control the government has over education-things like Ruby Ridge, the abuse of the constitution the way the media can shape attitudes on every level-from politics and morality to what corporation (by way of advertising) you will support-all these things come to mind.
It can drive one crazy if you think about it-which "they" do not want us to do.

Yet, this idea has been around for so long and men who would "rule" the world have held their meetings and actually appear to have made things happen. I do believe that the Dodd testimony in my above post is true as far as anyone could possibly prove or disprove. (All of this is so wordy, sorry)

It's all about connecting the dots. The most un-notable bits of information placed within a series of events, like a travel destination or vacationing with certain people on particular dates. Sometimes people don't even realize they may be holding the key to the puzzle.
Isn't that what conspiracy theories are really about? DA, I liked your comment-As the man said, "Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you." Funny...yet so true.

[Tom Earp]

Holly S**t Bat Woman, is this offf of the wall or what?

I feel Soylent Green coming on!

There will never be a General Conscencious of oppinon among World Leaders who want to have the Power To Control. The Biggest Boy With The Biggest Stick!

The Leauge Of Nations was a wonderful idea at the Time, but that was when certain Countrys were the World Powers, USA, Briton, France ETC!

Now, anyone who has Nuke Ability, China, Iran, Pakistan, India, and North Korea are in the picture. Who is and will be the first to use it in a moment of stupidity!

The UN is another Pie In The Sky Organization who has been around longer, but never the less in effective.

How can We as Civilized People Condon the atrocities that happen in our world today whether it be starvatin, beheading, killing of race and religion?

Sorry, lets just blow the whole damn planet up before the Spacemen get us!

[justamom]

Originally posted by Tom Earp
Holly S**t Bat Woman, is this offf of the wall or what?

It's my trademark.

Sorry, lets just blow the whole damn planet up before the Spacemen get us!

Didn't you KNOW-They're already here!!!

[_Opi_]

Originally posted by justamom


If they can break Christianity the rest will be quite an easy task.

I'm sorry. But this comment distrubs me a little. I understand this is solely your opinion but are you suggesting that other religions are easy to discard and that they are not as deep rooted as --lets say christianity? That comment seemed like a putdown to other great religions. And as for the Koran and other symbols being visible while christianity is not, I beg to differ. In countries such as France (probably followed suit by other euro countries), they are working to ban religious symbols in public places. That includes religious symbols (hijabs, crosses, jewish head caps, the seikh turbans, etc etc). They are all on the same boat if you ask me.

Just my 2 cents!

[justamom]

I am in TOTAL agreement-I just didn't make it clear.
_Opi_"In countries such as France (probably followed suit by other euro countries), they are working to ban religious symbols in public places. That includes religious symbols (hijabs, crosses, jewish head caps, the seikh turbans, etc etc). They are all on the same boat if you ask me."


What I said-"The past and current efforts to get ALL Christian symbols removed yet OK to have the Koran and other symbols visible-Winter Holidays not Christmas... If they can break Christianity the rest will be quite an easy task."

I really should have specified ... to what's happening in the US. Considering how strong Christianity is here (largest organized faith in the US), if they break it (remove every symbol or related, designated event), I feel that ALL religions within the US will be broken. (Not allowed to show any outward symbol that identifies their beliefs)
That's what I meant. I also accept that some may still disagree with my feelings. The point I was trying to make was that it's in our own back yards and within the context of one world govt., they would like to see all individual religions-their leaders-their followers defused. NOT that we would all suddenly turn into agnostics or atheists-NOR that Christianity was holding everything together. When the strongest faith (largest numbers) of ANY region or country is practically forced underground, you are repeating history and weakening the stand the other faiths can take. It's happening all over the world to all different faiths.