GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Recruitment
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Recruitment General discussion about recruitment.

» GC Stats
Members: 329,709
Threads: 115,665
Posts: 2,204,918
Welcome to our newest member, zoiviamaarleyz4
» Online Users: 1,860
1 members and 1,859 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 02-11-2003, 09:47 AM
GPhiBLtColonel GPhiBLtColonel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Peachtree City, Georgia
Posts: 1,209
Thumbs down Politically Correct terms?

...I think it'd be interesting to hear what "the masses" feel about the use of supposedly PC terms like recruitment (which as a retired military officer I personally object to!) instead of rush; new member instead of pledge and any others that come to mind. Frankly there are fewer more subservient roles to be in life than a RECRUIT!!! It automatically implies being at the lowest rung as an enlisted person who is ordered around my everyone above her/him in the chain of command! Why is that more PC than rush and pledge??? Personally I cannot for the life of me imagine what whiney person felt slihted by and objected to being call a pledge and why the term rush is so offensive? How exactly did they come about? Do these terms really help anything? I would love to hear from someone who says she feels much better about herself because she is called a new member who was recruited rather than a pledge who was rushed???
So what do y'all think? Should we tell the powers that be we want to go back to the way it was or what?
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.