GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,731
Threads: 115,666
Posts: 2,205,023
Welcome to our newest member, guldop
» Online Users: 1,612
2 members and 1,610 guests
amIblue?
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2002, 10:27 AM
The1calledTKE The1calledTKE is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Georgia Bulldog Country
Posts: 7,632
Send a message via AIM to The1calledTKE Send a message via Yahoo to The1calledTKE
Judge: Parents not to smoke around child

CLEVELAND, Ohio (AP) -- A judge settling custody matters for an estranged couple ordered the pair not to smoke around their daughter, a ruling experts said was the only known example of a court independently raising the issue of secondhand smoke.

Judge William Chinnock's ruling said the 8-year-old is healthy, and it didn't mention any testimony about possible health threats posed by adults smoking in her presence.

Instead, he cited in detail dozens of studies on the harms caused by secondhand smoke and concluded that the court was obligated to act in the child's best interests and limit her exposure to smoke.

"A family court that fails to issue court orders restraining persons from smoking in the presence of children under its jurisdiction is failing the children whom the law has entrusted to its care," Chinnock wrote in the August 27 decision in Lake County.

John Banzhaf III, executive director of Washington, D.C.-based Action on Smoking and Health, said many divorce proceedings now include agreements not to smoke around the children, usually when a nonsmoking parent specifically cites concerns about a child's health.

"This is the first one I have heard of where the judge on his own suddenly raised the issue," he said.

Chinnock also ordered the girl's parents not to let anyone else smoke around her.

The family wasn't identified. The girl lives with her mother and the mother's boyfriend, and one of the adults smokes, according to Chinnock's court order.

Chinnock wouldn't comment on the case, citing privacy rules of juvenile court.

Karen Lawson, the attorney for the girl's mother, said the judge issued the smoking order without prodding from either parent. Lawson said she had not decided whether to appeal.

Paul Boynton, a lawyer and contributing editor for Ohio Lawyers Weekly in Cleveland, said the order raises troubling questions about the limits of a court's authority to dictate a child's home environment.

"This really gets into the right to privacy," Boynton said. "Where do you draw the line?"

John Lawson, who helps parents resolve custody and child support issues through the Cleveland Works social services program, was skeptical that the ruling could be enforced, though he said it did seem to be within the court's authority.

"The judge has absolute discretion to make decisions that are in the child's best interest," Lawson said. Protecting children from secondhand smoke "is not that far out a concept."

The judge has been involved in several other high-profile cases. In 1998, he issued a report saying that Cuyahoga County's military-style boot camp didn't reform juvenile delinquents because "boot camps simply make hoodlums into stronger hoodlums." The county shut down the facility.

He also ordered four teens involved in making an X-rated movie to work with a shelter for abuse victims.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.