GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,731
Threads: 115,666
Posts: 2,205,023
Welcome to our newest member, guldop
» Online Users: 1,300
1 members and 1,299 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:56 PM
DaemonSeid DaemonSeid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
Army discharges gay soldiers

WASHINGTON - The Army fired 11 soldiers in January for violating the military's policy that gay service members must keep their sexuality hidden, according to a Virginia congressman.

Democratic Rep. Jim Moran said he has requested monthly updates from the Pentagon on the impact of the policy until it is repealed. In a statement released on Thursday, Moran said the discharged soldiers included an intelligence collector, a military police officer, four infantry personnel, a health care specialist, a motor-transport operator and a water-treatment specialist.

"How many more good soldiers are we willing to lose due to a bad policy that makes us less safe and secure?" asked Moran, a member of the House panel that oversees military spending.


link

If they decide to take a civil suit, do you think they will have a case?
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:21 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
I think it would be a tough road for them if they sought civil remedies. As best I can remember (I don't have time to research the issue now), the federal courts have been fairly deferential to the armed forces in these types of cases, even after the Lawrence decision regarding privacy. I think that only the 9th Circuit (obviously) has held the armed forces to something higher than the "rational basis" standard in these matters.

ETA: In other words, they're going to have to prove a heck of a lot to make their claim stand up in court.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:34 PM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid View Post
I think it would be a tough road for them if they sought civil remedies. As best I can remember (I don't have time to research the issue now), the federal courts have been fairly deferential to the armed forces in these types of cases, even after the Lawrence decision regarding privacy. I think that only the 9th Circuit (obviously) has held the armed forces to something higher than the "rational basis" standard in these matters.

ETA: In other words, they're going to have to prove a heck of a lot to make their claim stand up in court.
. . . or sue in California and hope SCOTUS has better things to do.

Strategery, people - it works for lawyers too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:36 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
. . . or sue in California and hope SCOTUS has better things to do.

Strategery, people - it works for lawyers too.
Absolutely...in saying that the 9th Circuit stands alone, I also meant that if they got it into a US District Court out west, all bets were off.

Forum shopping is usually part of the deal anyway...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2009, 07:43 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid View Post
Absolutely...in saying that the 9th Circuit stands alone, I also meant that if they got it into a US District Court out west, all bets were off.

Forum shopping is usually part of the deal anyway...
But wouldn't it end up at the Supreme Court anyway? Can you see it not being appealed, unless the armed forces have had a big change of heart lately?

I see this as being one of the issues that will go away as one generation of leadership replaces another and that the policy itself will change. Until then, what could you point to at the federal level that the policy is unconstitutional?

I understand what you mean about the 9th circuit, but would the case really stop there? It might be fun to imagine the bigger cases that could keep the supreme court too busy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-13-2009, 08:06 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
But wouldn't it end up at the Supreme Court anyway? Can you see it not being appealed, unless the armed forces have had a big change of heart lately?

I see this as being one of the issues that will go away as one generation of leadership replaces another and that the policy itself will change. Until then, what could you point to at the federal level that the policy is unconstitutional?

I understand what you mean about the 9th circuit, but would the case really stop there? It might be fun to imagine the bigger cases that could keep the supreme court too busy.
It's no guarantee that the Supreme Court will even hear the case...appellant's lawyer may not file a cert petition, and the Court might not grant the petition if that happens. The Supreme Court reviews such a small number of cases (compared to the number of cert petitions, and the number of federal appellate cases) that it's always a better bet to assume that the Court won't end up reviewing a case.

As to whether it's Constitutional or not...it depends on how the appellate court frames the issue. Depending on the right involved, there are different standards by which the courts could view the issue in light of the Constitution, ranging in scrutiny from the rational basis standard to the strict scrutiny approach. Basically, it's a way of weighing the merits of the policy against any issues of Constitutional infringement. Depending on the standard used, the courts could find that the governmental interest is weighty enough to outweigh those Constitutional concerns.

In this case, I'd imagine it would be presented as some sort of equal protection argument.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2009, 08:22 PM
PeppyGPhiB PeppyGPhiB is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,413
I think it's time for this policy to be overturned. The Army is admitting convicted criminals and high school dropouts, for crying out loud. Yet they won't even enroll a gay college graduate fluent in Arabic. It's a joke that's hurting our military.

Jon Stewart had a guy on his show the other night talking about his book about this very subject: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/in...athaniel-Frank
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-14-2009, 10:42 PM
Thetagirl218 Thetagirl218 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeppyGPhiB View Post
I think it's time for this policy to be overturned. The Army is admitting convicted criminals and high school dropouts, for crying out loud. Yet they won't even enroll a gay college graduate fluent in Arabic. It's a joke that's hurting our military.
This is a very good point. Even though I personally don't agree with homosexuality, I am wary when the government says you can't do something because of your sexual preference. That is your own, private business.
__________________
"A Kappa Alpha Theta isn't something you become, its something you've always been!"


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:41 PM
knight_shadow knight_shadow is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,146
"Don't ask, don't tell" went into effect in the Clinton era, correct? I'd think that it would have been challenged by now.
__________________
*does side bends and sit-ups*
*doesn't lose butt*

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:09 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow View Post
"Don't ask, don't tell" went into effect in the Clinton era, correct? I'd think that it would have been challenged by now.
It has in federal courts, but as noted above, a clear consensus hasn't emerged as to the Constitutionality.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-14-2009, 05:35 PM
deepimpact2 deepimpact2 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow View Post
"Don't ask, don't tell" went into effect in the Clinton era, correct? I'd think that it would have been challenged by now.
Exactly.
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:51 PM
DrPhil DrPhil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
Thanks for approving of me. That means I can't be outcasted for my CHOICES.

So let's try to pretend that the law, religion, and morality do not intersect in most societies:

Based on the law, homosexuality is not against the law but certain "manifestations??" of homosexuality are against the law. That could translate to homosexuality as a form of deviance.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:52 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil View Post
Thanks for approving of me. That means I can't be outcasted for my CHOICES.

So let's try to pretend that the law, religion, and morality do not intersect in most societies:

Based on the law, homosexuality is not against the law but certain "manifestations??" of homosexuality are against the law. That could translate to homosexuality as a form of deviance.
But what manifestations of homosexuality are against the law? I can't think of any off the top of my head that would specifically apply to homosexuals.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:54 PM
DrPhil DrPhil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid View Post
But what manifestations of homosexuality are against the law? I can't think of any off the top of my head that would specifically apply to homosexuals.
Would gay marriage apply? What about sodomy laws that people try to apply to homosexuals/say are in reference to homosexuality.

Please don't disapprove. *biting nails*
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:59 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil View Post
Would gay marriage apply? What about sodomy laws that people try to apply to homosexuals/say are in reference to homosexuality.
I think we're defining the issue in different ways. I'm thinking specifically of instances where homosexual behavior is illegal.

I don't see gay marriage as a manifestation of homosexuality that's against the law. In those states where gay marriage is illegal, a gay couple wouldn't be able to falsify a marriage, or falsely represent that they are married. It's a measure against homosexual marraige, but not against homosexuality itself. But, I may be looking at the issue too narrowly. I also don't mean to marginalize the effect that such laws have on gay couples.

As to anti-sodomy laws, the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas invalidated all such laws in the US. So, if there are any laws like that, they're flying in the face of Supreme Court precedent.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Army lets soldiers take ‘I do’ to Iraq war zone jon1856 News & Politics 8 04-01-2008 03:08 PM
I need some soldiers (remix) _Lisa_ Cool Sites 0 11-15-2005 03:34 PM
U.S. Soldiers Extended ajuhdg News & Politics 16 05-14-2004 01:44 PM
Movie: We Were Soldiers James Entertainment 16 12-03-2002 07:40 PM
Soldiers for school Honeykiss1974 Alpha Kappa Alpha 1 06-24-2002 02:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.