Quote:
Originally posted by lifesaver
You completely contradict yourself in this post. You say that why we do things in our org and what they mean are FOR MEMBERS ONLY and not the public. Yet you publically admit that you read what was allegedly another orgs. secrets.  So the whole FOR MEMBERS ONLY thing only counts when its someone else wanting to know about a group, but its ok for you to know about another?
|
i assume you didn't read the part about someone else putting the information on the web. in no way does her discretion have
ANYTHING to do with whatever someone else wants to do with their lack thereof. if you all weren't so open and indiscrete about your secrets and/or processes, then stuff like this wouldn't happen.
it's not her fault that
SOMEONE ELSE put another org's secrets on the web. i don't think she was being all nosy and asking for it. the information was already
PROVIDED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC BY A THIRD PARTY. so i'm lost as to where you're not getting it.
and what the hell does she knowing about someone else's org have to do with you know about hers? they're not the same thing.