Quote:
Originally posted by SummerChild
Ladies,
Do you think that we should be tolerant of those in our organizations, in general (not really asking specifically about the sexual orientation thing)?
Like for instance, if a woman in one of our orgs was outwardly professing to do something that we think is negative, and not hiding the fact that she is a member of our org, do you think that as good members we say "to each her own," or as good members, do we shun that behavior if its a negative reflection on the organization?
For instance, what if we have a member who outwardly sleeps with the husbands of other women. Do we shun that or do we say to each her own?
What do you think?
SC
|
Now for me that is a whole 'nother issue--one of sisterhood.
And to the issue of crimes outside of the organization--I leave that to the criminal justice system, and the ruling documents of the organization.
As for the Gay issue, the Alphas already took a stand when they told E. Lynn Harris not to mention the fraternity in his books, nor publicly acknowledge his affiliation. But I guess the good news is they did not take his pin.
And I wish someone would answer the question I posed in the Alpha forum. Since this perception of Alpha being the Gay frat existed long before Rashid was born, or even thought of, what caused it to perpetuate all this time? Especially since being "out" is a relatively new phenomenom.