|
Context, people - it's 'sovereignty' not "Sovereignty" in this case. While I don't think Celucci has ever had a way with words, certainly here he spoke pretty far out of left field if the implications are intentional (and they probably are, b/c he's sort of a douche bag). However, the fact that the US will still combat issues in Canadian airspace quite literally requires US defenses to invade the sovereign airspace of Canada; thus, unfortunately, what he said is literally correct. Still, it's strange (and unfortunate) he used such harsh wording.
Edited for typographical retardation
Last edited by KSig RC; 03-01-2005 at 11:57 AM.
|