|
The article lacks a certain consistancy.
The author is saying that there needs to be general measures taken to hold fraternities to a higher standard.
The author then goes on to say that the deeds of a few people are what is maligning a good overall system.
So the author is saying that somehow the deeds of a few should prompt general and wide ranging rules that will impinge on the vast majority of people that the author has said are doing well.
That doesn't seem fair or productive.
|