Quote:
Originally posted by AKA_Monet
Tony- You are correct in your understanding... He has conveyed it to his companions (or whatever). And women, being women try to change men all the time... That's just the way it is. It isn't right, but that is what we do... It's the nurturing gene. Or the "I don't give a dayum" gene has not been activated, yet.
Yes, having a child out of wedlock is a decision he would have to live with if he chose that route. You know the strengths and weaknesses of doing something like that, don't you?
I don't care how you slice it, anyone that makes that route for themselves without whole consent of the other party is destined to call him or herself into rough times, generally speaking. Maybe, we hope, it will work out. He can get a woman pregnant, have his child and not have to be married and everything will be copastetic... Cool... Whatever... But in the real world, that hardly EVER happens and there is ALWAYS drama--forever... 'Cuz now, we are talking about another human being's life here...
And you know I have issues with this, too... Search my posts...
|
Well, both my children were born within the bonds of wedlock, but I can intellectually grasp what he wants to do.
...And I suspect the "I don't give a dayum" gene is closely linked to the "You need to meet my friend" gene? Sistahs, I have found, love to play match-maker.