Two things that I am interested in:
The Andrea Yates case and how it got reversed. You can use that from the Procedure standpoint and discuss the type of reversible error the trial court made there and the expert witness' faulty testimony.
You can also talk about the Peterson trial and HOW IN THE WORLD that court allowed the jury to simply kick out the super juror (the Dr./Lawyer) That was such a ground for appeal. Actually, I believe the jury bounced a couple of people on a whim come to think of it. Of course, it could be that they let that fly for that very reason: to set the case up for appeal. Anyway, its worth exploring.
|