Quote:
Originally posted by hottytoddy
The guy that threw the cup at Artest was throwing punches at him when he came in the stands...and he has a criminal record--and was not supposed to drink as a condition of his probation. But I mean seriously the guy that he ended up beating on may not have been the one to throw the cup but I highly doubt that he is 100% innocent. I have a feeling he had been talking shit the whole game. There was some reason Artest thought it was specifically that guy, at least in my opinion. I'm not sure I'd rule him out as an innocent bystander just yet.
|
So what if he was talking shit at the game. You can't sit here and tell me that you don't go to sporting events and talk shit about the other players. Its doesn't even matter if he was talking shit though, Artest could not have possibly heard it. If you watched the fight, the guy that Artest attacked first still had a cup in his hand...so Artest just went for the first person he saw. It doesn't matter if Artest thought he was the guy or not. He did not need to go off like he did and hit a fan. You don't see our players hitting Pacer's fans because they "talk shit". There was no reason for Artest to hit that guy! I never said the guy that threw the cup should sue, I am saying the guy that Artest attacked, who didn't throw the cup, deserves to sue! He didn't deserve to get attacked cause some other ass hole threw a cup!