View Single Post
  #81  
Old 11-23-2004, 05:34 PM
hottytoddy hottytoddy is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,414
Send a message via ICQ to hottytoddy Send a message via AIM to hottytoddy Send a message via Yahoo to hottytoddy
Quote:
Originally posted by SigmaNuPhi4Life
see that is where you are wrong. The players have every right to sue. The guy that got hit by Artest did not even throw the cup of beer at Artest, and he was only 19 years old. And how about the old lady that got pushed onto the court by the fight, and then got piled on like she was the QB in a football game? Now I can understand the fans that were thwoing punches at the players, they shouldn't be able to sue, and they aren't...they are getting sued. But the innocent people should have every right to sue. So you are so wrong when you say the fans have no right to sue!
The guy that threw the cup at Artest was throwing punches at him when he came in the stands...and he has a criminal record--and was not supposed to drink as a condition of his probation. But I mean seriously the guy that he ended up beating on may not have been the one to throw the cup but I highly doubt that he is 100% innocent. I have a feeling he had been talking shit the whole game. There was some reason Artest thought it was specifically that guy, at least in my opinion. I'm not sure I'd rule him out as an innocent bystander just yet.
__________________
Phi Mu
Reply With Quote