|
So the basic arguement i've seen some put for is that a double standard should apply?
The way I see it is this: if the situation was reversed (unarmed, unconsious Marine killed in a church) the "terrorist" would be judged as the most base creature... so why shouldn't the same standard that is used to define the criminal acts of the "enemy" be applied to this Marine?
__________________
Λ Χ Α
University of Toronto Alum
EE755
"Cave ab homine unius libri"
|