Quote:
Originally posted by Rudey
2 things:
1) So many things are just words. For example, there are several Arab rulers who talk about non-violence and peace one day along with the rejection of terrorism and then the next day talk about jihad, jihad, jihad and define terrorism as they see fit.
2) How do they define terrorism? Do they say that Iraqis who are attacking Americans should stop? Do they say they should stop in mosques only? Do they try and define terrorism in a way to suit them?
-Rudey
|
1) Give me one example of how the two organizations have even hinted that they are in favor of violence. The two organizations have never advocated violance and has even , without hesitation, go against the implementation of Sharia.
2) They support the anti-terrorism legislation: the Government Regulation in lieu of Law No.1/2002 on fighting terrorism. So, their definition is the same as the Indonesian government.