It was a scary verdict, but I am not surprised by it.
Its a scary verdict because they basically put his "character" on trial not the evidence. IF he did it, he managed to leave less forensic evidence than a proffessional killer.
With OJ I told people it was a scary verdict because if OJ was innocent it took him millions to get of, a defense fund that you and I would not be able to raise.
With PEterson its scary because it says that in the absence of an obvious supsect the police will go after the husband like that and fry him based on him not being a "nice" person.
A major motivator in that court room was the fact he was having an affair, but if every man thqat cheated killed his significant other, there would be a serious drop in the female population.
|