Since Osama bin Laden and al Queda were linked to all of the incidents you list below, how in the world is a war on Iraq (which is costing more and more American lives and money
) a pre-emptive or responsive strike to terrorism? Oh yeah, you forgot the attacks on our embassies in Africa, bin Laden was linked to those too!
Quote:
Originally posted by Love_Spell_6
I do not consider this war pre-emptive..considering we had been attacked on the USS Cole, the World Trade Center, and 9-11....this is primarily where u and I..and many others will disagree. I think our past policies of not being on the offensive against terrorists (not limited to saddam and bin laden) were silly. And I would hardly say its little evidence being that ALL credible intelligence said the same thing at the time..and the Russian President personally called Dubya TWICE to tell him he had proof we were going to be attacked..so again....many look at what i've said and will still default to the same ol rhetoric bush lied people died...or we're ignoring the war on terror because we haven't caught bin laden...but I and the majority of people in America..disagree.
|