Quote:
Originally posted by KSig RC:
OK, well . . . Math's sorta my thing, and the 'dis-proof' would be this (assuming we require one):
first line - girls require time and money becomes girls = time x money.
This is akin to saying "twenty requires five and four", which actually would imply something else - more likely, it would become either twenty requires two and zero, or twenty requires 10 and 10 (etc).
let's assume this to be correct, as stated in the second way.
So the new proof:
Girls require time and money.
Girls = time + money.
time is money
girls = money + money = 2money
money is the root of all evil
girls =2(sqrt(evil))
so this way, girls are merely fractional evil . . . which i actually like more - think about it: Girls are soft, smell good . . . you know where I'm going here . . . but they're so damn evil too. I'm sticking by my 'fractional evil' theory . . .
*note - i'm just f-ing around, no comments necessary thanks*
|
That's awesome, Rob! How long did it take (or little) to disprove Cory's theorem? Actually, yeah, if I had to choose between those two theorems...I like your's better, too
.
Can anyone try to disprove it so that girls do NOT equal evil?? Though it might be impossible if you use the money factor.
[This message has been edited by newbie (edited June 20, 2001).]