Quote:
Originally posted by DeltAlum
Oh, then who were you talking about when you said that something someone did thirty years ago doesn't apply to what he does today in reply to my comment about Ailes. Seems to me that there's a pretty direct link.
As for saying the stuff in the resume before -- I did, but I didn't know for sure, which I also said, until I did the research. That's why it appeared as a clearly marked edit.
|
Cheese and crackers.
What someone, anyone, Roger Ailes, the Pope, Cher, who EVER, did 30 years ago does not necessarily have anything to do with what they do now. PERIOD. And bringing it up with nothing correlating what they are doing now is a poor/lazy way to try and prove your point. My gripe is with your faulty methods, not with your singling out someone who's obviously been consistently involved with the same party.
Wouldn't it just have been easier to say in the first place that he's been a consistent worker for/contributor to the GOP than yelling "he worked for Nixon"? Sorry, but not everyone thinks Nixon is the apex of Republicanism, evil, or Republican evil. The shorthand doesn't work.