Quote:
Originally posted by James
The sexual harrassment category is so vague its almost silly.
Its a crime of perception and comfort zones.
In the article i read it sounds like he viewed her as a friend as well as co-worker and so may have spoken about stuff that looks odd to those not privy to the context of the original conversation.
|
If it's true that he was discussing with her the circumstances of his losing his virginity (blech), among other things, how can that be considered "vague"?
At the very least, it shows a real lack of professionalism on his part if the allegations are true.
The lawyer is sketchy. When I saw him for the first time, I thought he was a personal injury attorney.