Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
Again Rudey I did do analysis as part of a work related training exercise - it was actually interesting to argue the supporting points out with people admantaly convinced of the IDF allegations... it reinforced the lesson of taking a objective view of any anaylsis work for some of the new people. The actual opinion reached was that someone was biased in their interpretation of the video footage that they recieved, jump to a conclusion that supported their bias, and then released the video and allegations to early - before proper analysis was done. It served as a nice object lesson for some of the new members to abandon their preconceptions at the door when they are doing analysis...
Now I'm pretty much going to try and sit back and not get sucked in by your personal attacks.... and hopefully let more constructive discussion about the subject matter take place.
|
Right, right. Let me repeat my post earlier since it responds to you quite eloquently.
Let's restate the facts. The IDF and the UN did an investigation. Before their investigation was done or started you automatically said Israel was wrong and pretended like you knew. You knew nothing, did no investigation and said that.
The organization's ambulances have been used in the past by terrorists. Terrorists are employed by the organization and the head of the organization is proud of this.
So the only thing you show is a bias and a strong case of ignorance.
-Rudey