[msn4med1975]

I really was trying to stay out of this discussion because on some levels we'll always disagree with one another on topics like this but I am interested in your answers to these questions. Answer them however you like or if you like but needless to say I'm intrigued.

1) How exactly did the Alpha Phi Alpha founders defie what men were supposed to be? What is lacking in their organization, according to you, that some of your comments were warranted?

2) Without being intimately involved with an organization is commenting on public aspects of the organization warranted (ie stating the brothers of Omega Psi Phi would persevere but may not arrive or all they do is hop around and bark).

3) Why is it you can't give respect to women who either brought in the line or are on the line that is larger than you would like? And what reason do you have to question their sisterhood? (Just wondering because while yes it could be about money to someone somewhere, there may be a justified reason for the large line--ie 600 women showed up to rush they took the 60 most qualified or about 10 percent of those in attendance)

4) Was there any particular reason why you ignored the men of Phi Beta Sigma or Iota Phi Theta in your discussion?

5) Isn't BGLO life big enough to welcome all those that would work for their organization and respect it?

6) Is being "made" so important in the Kappa realm, according you, that all of these hazing reports and subsequent suspensions are just to be expected?