Daaaymmm, I think you just lost your moral high card in the game of nice versus meaness.
Your post doesn't even make sense in context because its not being bitchy to Jules at all, if anyone it should be freaking out right now its Mullet, since she is the one I am insulting. I am surpirsed you would defend mullet.
However, it is rather clever to say I am a skeezy 30, 40, 50, 60 or whatever guy that has used my 5 years on GC to try and pick all you girls up.
I mean just reading that looks pretty bad. Damn, I mean I know me, and I even think I must be some perv trolling along trying pick pre adolescents that their mommies leave unguarded.
(in a spooky voice)"Want some candy little girl . . . "
But thats part of what we mean when we are talking about you and the harem Sugar and Spice.
You guys don't attack the message. We would all understand that.
You guys will gang up and attack the messenger. You will make snide comments about them or insult them in an effort to discredit them so that their views are not taken seriously.
James is a perv that is stalking GC girls online . . . wow, who is going to listen to him? Is he credible? Run away all girls on GC
You would think John would have banned a moderator that does that by now. 5 years of picking up GC women. Go James.
Quote:
Originally posted by sugar and spice
Oh honey, was that ever low.
Everybody in this thread knows that the only reason you're being so bitchy to J. is because she's the one who outed you as a 32-year-old skeeze trying to pick up college girls on the internet. I kept my lips zipped on that particular point because I didn't feel like I needed to aim below the belt with you, but since you went there first . . .
One percent pure trash to pull that shit on J. when you know she's not around to defend herself. Speaking of "tubby" -- pot, kettle, honey?
As I am not supposed to use discuss R**** anymore because apparently that qualifies as stalking him, I will not even bother to go into detail, but to clear some misconceptions up:
1) R.'s information was posted LONG before the incident with RACooper
2) Apparently you skipped over the part in the "Roll call" thread where I pointed out that it was not even entirely the H&A the posted his info?
3) Nobody except those "in the know" had a friggin' clue what his information alluded to. Ask the mods who were asked to delete it -- they thought it had something to do with his religious beliefs until they were set straight.
4) Contrary to what R. might have you believe, I've played a minimal role in anything related to "stalking"  him. The people who have played the largest roles are those that he is still friendly with and that he talks to on a regular basis. I've taken the blame for my place in the baby pic debacle and that's about all I can own up to. R. just likes to whine because he thrives on attention.
5) It took about five minutes total for anyone to figure out R.'s full name given the information gleaned from GC. I want to point that out as a warning to anybody who posts here -- if anybody really wanted to gut R., they wouldn't have had too tough of a time figuring out where to find him.
|