Well thats a good question and deserves a serious answer.
The short version is that the entire matter is unimportant to the boards.
If XYZcutie had "outed" mullet I would probably have just asked for the thread to be deleted and a caution sent to her about bringing up non-GC stuff or posting people's personal data on the net.
Or censored creating a situation where mullet is being smeared for no discenerable reason. ITs a character attack that mullet couldn't fight against even if it wasn't true. How can you prove a negative?
I could smear any of the people on GC just by making sinister comments.
I would think that action needed to be taken if Mullet were a problem poster on GC, was personally attacking people, or was posting personal data on GC.
Or even as a stretch, if Mullet were harrassing GC'ers off the site but because of GC. And maybe this is more like this? But I would have wanted to handle most of that stuff privately because that is he said she said.
In the end, the situation as presented really doesn't effect the boards, and much like sexual relationships between GC'ers its not something that needs to aired.
Also, I find it distasteful when people smear others on here because of personal likes and dislikes.
Harem Stuff.
It seems that you, Sugar and Spice periodically come out as the voice of reason for the H & A, and of course yourself.
And honestly, I am having a hard time remembering when you have been specifically guilty of much that is attributed to the H & A.
However, you have chosen to belong to and help build a clique that is generally considered to be the mean girls of GC.
So when I see a post like this, and its not a seemingly important issue to the boards, it just seems par for the course.
And H & A members have done some reall odd stuff. The Honeychile fake live journal account.
Also didn't you guys post Rudey's pics as well as his personal information online? I seem to recall that from a while ago.
Wouldn't those people feel harrassed? O threatened?
I can guarentee you that more people have quit GC because of the antics of the H & A than the possible deceptions of Mullet.
In Greek Chat Board terms, having the H & A give dire warnings about Mullet, when most of her "deceptions" have nothing to do with Greek Chat, is a little like pedophiles telling us that someone that has tried anal sex is a real deviant.
Oh, I am just making an extreme comparison. I don't think that any of the H & A and pals like little children sexually.
Where the harem comes in
Quote:
Originally posted by sugar and spice
Would you have reacted differently if it had been somebody other than the H&A that had "outed" this girl? To be completely honest with you, we anticipated that and contemplated passing the info off to somebody else not associated with us just so we would be taken more seriously, but ultimately figured that was unnecessary as people would just be concerned enough about the news that they wouldn't be swayed by its source. Apparently you managed to prove us wrong and that is an issue . . .
|