What amazes me about this ruling is that two of these "judges" thought it was just fine that the local mayor decided to reinterpret state law to his political convenience. That issue has nothing to do with same-sex marriage. I'd really love to read their opinions on the case. What kind of convoluted logic could justify that kind of vote?
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|