Quote:
Originally posted by thatgirl:
And while you brought up the pink hair thing, let me make this crystal clear:
It's NOT the same thing
A man being allowed to wear his hair in it's NATURAL state is not to be compared to a person who deliberately dyes or chemically treats their hair in order to stand out.
[]
|
While i totally agree with you as far as locs and dying being totally different, locs aren't the only way to wear one's hair naturally. There are shorter, nautral hairstyles that aren't locs. Plus, it's not necessary to wear them that long. BEFORE ANYONE ATTACKS THAT STATEMENT: I UNDERSTAND IN HIS PARTICULAR CASE THAT RELIGION PLAYED A ROLE IN THE LENGTH. I am only responding to the arguement highlighted above. Believe me, I agree with the majority on this one about him keeping his locs so long as they are well kept and neat -- I was just wondering about your (well, everyone's) response to that particular arguement. "White" hair naturally grows long, but in many situations men are required to cut it off short, along with facial hair, which is also natural. Any thoughts? (No flames please)