Quote:
Originally posted by AlphaGamDiva
[B]Originally posted by sugar and spice
ok:
you remember when every other thread in news and politics was about reagan and how super he was and how bad the dems are and all that? ok......remember how a lot of ppl found that SUPER annoying and instead of politely PMing the guy about it (or just skipping over those threads) and being adult, they instead created even more threads discussing him and his threads....of course without using his name, but you KNEW that they were talking about him. and to further make their point, they created some aliases and it was just as obnoxious as his 100 threads on reagan? yeah.....it's that kind of all the time, in your face blah blah blah. and threads with weird titles i ALWAYS read b/c before, those sometimes turned out interesting. these days, i see something with a weird title and i read it and am like, "oh....this is for ____, not for GC" ppl got annoyed with reagan threads, a lot of others also get annoyed with cliquey threads. same thing. you may not HAVE to read something, but it's still there and it's still annoying.
twhrider13, c'mon in! 
|
If I had to sit through too many threads of Reagan BS, why shouldn't you have to sit through too many threads on inside jokes that you don't understand?
I would like to point out that there were multiple people who are not in any way affiliated with a "clique" that adored Glue Stick et al. Just because you were annoyed with it doesn't mean that it doesn't have a place on the boards -- such is GC.