Being anti-semitic and being White Trash are different things. One affects people, the other doesn't. If people tell you that you are, I'm sure they don't have turrets. Evidently you thought about it so much that you came on here saying you weren't. Remember when you tried to tell me I was wrong to feel that there was anti-semitism in Europe too>?
WMD? Again, they said the weapons were there - they being intelligence agencies all over the world as well as the UN. Saddam says they weren't. For them to not be there they either have to be destroyed or moved. For it to be destroyed means there are sites with the materials around. Again, we might not have found WMD but we have not found WMD destruction sites. Evidently you have such difficulty arguing when you feel you're anti-semitic and know Rudey is going to prove you wrong that you digress. Great job.
Again, YOU AND NEW ZEALAND HAVE NO PROOF.
Since you can't read,
Since you can't think logically,
why don't you just tell me I'm ugly and have no personality?
-Rudey
--No proof? No proof? woo woo an old man who went to college at the ripe old age of retirement has no proof?
Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
The breadth of your material needs improving… the same old tired (almost cliché now) line of dismissive insults again: my military service precluding me from knowledge of other aspects of the world in which we live, while at the same time somehow not being knowledgeable about the military; yours views of my intellect, but then considering the others you have insulted with regards to their intellect and education, I’d have to consider myself in good company; and my finally using my age as something to insult or use as somehow derogatory… which I might add is discriminatory (the same as making derogatory or bigoted comments about say a person’s sex or race… at least legally).
Yes I have had people call me anti-Semitic… but I’ve also been called a “Jew Lover”, a Nazi, a Fascist, a Socialist, White Trash, a Spoiled Rich Kid, a Hippy, a “Baby Killer”, an idiot (one of your favourites), and an intellectual elitist… but I dismissed those as the ravings of people who enjoy nothing more than trying to force their views on others… without being willing to debate their beliefs, much less defend them. It’s a poor debater that resorts to insults instead of coherent arguments and opinion… so you might want to consider that before you dismiss either myself or others on GC who are attempting to carry-on at least the semblance of adult debate.
As for the topic… so neither New Zealand nor myself have proof of anything? Well other than relying on past experience and the allegations of New Zealand security services and Canadian intelligence… but then we all know how governments or their intelligence services can misinterpret intelligence huh? Well so far Canadian and New Zealand services are convinced of the sentenced men’s involvement with Mossad, either as agents or in their employ, but since our countries aren’t important I guess it doesn’t matter does it? After all you’ve said Canada isn’t important… and apparently Israel has the same opinion of New Zealand:
<A BBC correspondent in Jerusalem, David Chazan, says Israeli officials give the impression of regarding New Zealand as a relatively unimportant country. Sources close to the government say the Israeli reaction might have been different if a larger and more influential country had been involved.>
full article-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3896009.stm
While I may be wrong, and New Zealand might be wrong, and Canadian intelligence might be wrong… but I have to wonder why they would suppose that these two men that have been sentenced have ties to Mossad? In the case of using a previous argument that you used against me on other subjects… perhaps they know something you don’t… afterall that was your argument concerning my doubts about the intelligence concerning WMD.
|