View Single Post
  #10  
Old 07-10-2004, 11:02 AM
sigtau305 sigtau305 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 9,324
Send a message via ICQ to sigtau305 Send a message via Yahoo to sigtau305
Re: Carlos Boozer situation

Quote:
Originally posted by KSigkid
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1836318

I was going to make a seperate thread for this, but didn't think it would get enough replies. What do you all think of the situation? Was he right to take Utah's money, or should he have signed the deal with Cleveland and trusted them? Did Paxson make a huge mistake on this one?
To me, It was a big mistake on Jim Paxson's part. He should have exercied Carlos Boozer's Contract ( which would pay him at $ 700,000) and work with his agent during the course of this upcoming season and trying to come to a agreement on a long-term contract. Utah had wanted Carlos for the longest time but couldn't get him in the draft. Unless there's a BIG miracle to match or exceed Utah's contract offer, Boozer's days as a Cavalier is over.
__________________
Garth J. Lampkin, Diversity and Inclusion Chair, Region 4
Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity


LetEmKnow!!RollTau!!
Reply With Quote