View Single Post
  #23  
Old 07-05-2004, 07:37 PM
mommag2 mommag2 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 149
Send a message via AIM to mommag2 Send a message via Yahoo to mommag2
[QUOTE]Originally posted by AXiD670
Okay, I'm going to play devil's advocate for a second. Just for the sake of argument, couldn't the testing of initiated members also be considered hazing? We talk on this board about how you can haze active members too...wouldn't requiring active members to achieve a certain score on the test be an example of this? If the actives don't achieve a certain score, then there is a negative consequence (in this example, the loss of member points).

Thoughts?
[/QUOTE

My thoughts are this. No it would not be considered hazing because everyone has to take it and yes there are consequences for the actives, but there are also consequences for NM.

So if I understand the derfinition of Hazing, then as long as there is a consequence for all that take the test when it is given, then correct me if I am wrong, it cannot be considered hazing.

NM need 85%....NO 85%, no initiation....consequence
Active need certain score....no good score points taken..consequence.
Reply With Quote