Quote:
Originally posted by Rudey
And they said he had weapons of mass destruction. I love this retard. When he can't think and can't read and can't say anything he just jumps to the insult.
The UN said those WMD existed. They did not find evidence of their destruction. So what does that mean??? Tell me what that means.
-Rudey
--I can't believe this ignant man
|
Gotta love it... Rudey your slipping, this doesn't meet the outrageous standards of your previous personal attacks or insults....
Right, I'll try to explain this to you using simple language... Yes the UN said that weapons did exist and mandated Sadam to destroy or dismantle the WMD and development programs following the first Gulf War... and many inspectors where involved in ensuring this happened. Sadam and the inspectors played cat and mouse through-out the 90s...
Now the Sadam regime tried to keep as many secrets as possible from the UN inspectors (because of understandable worries that the inspectors had foreign intelligence agents in their ranks), but he repeatedly claimed that he had elimnated the weapons and dismantled the programs... and UN inspectors couldn't counter this as no evidence of WMD were found, and scant evidence of their destruction was found... now here is where you argue that if evidence of their existance or destruction can't be found they must still be out there... where as I take the view that if evidence of their existance or destruction can't be found perhaps Sadam was truthful about their destruction, because after all now evidence countering this has been found either.