Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
Please read... you know connect those symbols together to form words, and ultimately sentences...
I believe I stated that the UN was looking for evidence of the destruction of the WMD, because no evidence of the existance of remaining WMD was found. Sadam claimed that they were destroyed, but he was obstinate about presenting proof or allowing inspection teams on "sensitve" sites. So until I see evidence of the much bandied about WMD that Bush used as the primary case for war at the UN and the international community I will continue to believe the reports of the UN weapons inspectors, because as it stands right now they have more credibility.
|
And they said he had weapons of mass destruction. I love this retard. When he can't think and can't read and can't say anything he just jumps to the insult.
The UN said those WMD existed. They did not find evidence of their destruction. So what does that mean??? Tell me what that means.
-Rudey
--I can't believe this ignant man