View Single Post
  #12  
Old 06-29-2004, 05:31 PM
Rudey Rudey is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
Where is your evidence of the destruction of WMD???

For there to be no WMD it would mean there would have to be a destruction of the WMD because they did exist.

So where is that landfill of weapons???

Let me know when you can...Where is the landfill Cooper????? Where is it?? It's like Santa. You say it exists but it doesn't. All those years that Hussein didn't cooperate with the UN. All the months that the US brought even more pressure on Iraq and still no WMD destruction sites. Even now, no WMD destruction sites.

-Rudey
--So show us where they are...you have military training and yada yada hate other fraternities so where are they old man???

Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
Ahem.. please read the original posts, because it mentioned that it was specfically post 9-11 actions by Iraq to destablize the region that was the focus of discussion.... because last time I checked all of the incidents you cite (with the exception of military actions against Kurdish "insurgents") happened somewhat prior to 9-11.

As for Al Queda connections... yes there was a base in northern Iraq affiliated with this group, but Ironically it was protected from Iraqi military action by the no-fly zone enforcement. I also believe that there was evidence one military officer linked with Al Queda... however that is a weak arguement, as members of the US military have also been found to have connections to Al Queda too.

As for WMD I believe that the UN was conducting inspections to determine the destruction or neutralization of WMD, and as they had found no WMD they were looking then for evidence of their destruction... and nor did the whole world didn't believe he still possessed WMD, as that was one reason cited that I know Canada, France, Germany, and Russia for not engaging in the military action (aside from the side-stepping of the UN by the US & UK).
Reply With Quote