|
To be clear, I was addressing the comment that the branding appeared to be part of the chapter's programs. I may have missed it, but nowhere did I read that it was part of the chapter's program.
Moving forward and with respect to risk management, I do agree with the "throw mud at it" analogy. (Something I've heard before as well.) And frankly, the reason I used the two examples I did was that these two events could also be considered hazing and or risk management issues. Think forced study hours and forced (power hour) drinking. Yet if done voluntarily and responsibly, then there isn't an issue.
At this time we don't know enough about the situation to really make a judgment call regarding hazing or risk management. But from what the original post said, and from Internet research, it seems like so far the only issue is with a pissed off farther.
Which may be bad enough for the son.
|