As I've said before, I think EVERYONE deserves to go through a pledging process. I think the problem comes in when the line is being tested and learning about unity. Some "sorors/frats" don't believe this can be done without physically hazing the line. That's basically where the problem lies.
In my opinion, pledging CAN be separated from hazing (physically harming a pledge). I mean wearing a uniform, walking on line, cutting corners, taking a "vow of silence", publicly greeting the members of "your" organization and other greeks (depending on your org.) is NOT hazing but these things create unity amongst the line and the chapter. Sadly, some campus' consider all of these things hazing.
Also, contrary to what others may believe, as a pledge I think you should have to prove yourself to the organization. This doesn't mean beating a pledge half to death. There are a lot of ways to "test" the loyalty of a pledge or a line. (Make your own inferences.) Having someone do your laundry and performing other menial and ridiculous tasks does not test loyalty. That just means the individual is capable of following directions.
Anyway, that's what I think. Although I am NOT in a BGLO sorority, I think the NPHC should reconsider their stand on pledging because the MIP seems to be creating discord amongst members of the same organization. Remember, we are only as strong as our weakest link. (Something I learned from plegding!
)
Serena (Serene) #2
Sigma Lambda Upsilon/Senoritas Latinas Unidas Sorority, Inc.
[This message has been edited by Serenity (edited April 16, 2000).]