not bogus soror... my sentiments exactly, i was just too lazy to type all that. but i knew *somebody* would "feel" me!
Unless this is a sanction that the NPHC specifially put on them (which I seriously doubt, if they are suspended under the university) it seems as if the university is taking advantage of the "historical" perception of hazing in HBGLOs-- this in itself is bogus, because the ridiculous amount of hazing and people dying left and right in non-HBGLOS simply isn't NEARLY as publicized in the media.
I'll be suprised if the NPHC at SDSU doesn't put up a fight over this, and the university has really dug it's own hole-- all the rest of the sanctions are eventually going to be called into question as well, if they've pulled a whack move on this point.
Quote:
Originally posted by PsychTau
Question (because I wrote a paper about hazing differences this semester):
Do you think anti-hazing education programs should be different between NPHC Fraternities, NPHC Sororities, IFC and NPC? Granted, some of the information presented could be the same, but do you think that those different groups define/see hazing differently?
PsychTau
|
I honestly don't know... I've never really looked at the differences between how members in different systems think about hazing. And also, it's such an individual matter, that one person in an org isn't necessarily going to think at all the way the next person is. That would be an interesting dialogue, though... I'm interested in what you discovered in your research.