Thread: Baby Names
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-02-2000, 10:52 AM
c&c1913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by DoggyStyle82:
We will agree to disagree. Obviously, you don't get the point. Why would I marry a woman who didn't want to be a wife (i.e mother and homemaker) There is more to a marriage than spousal companionship. Marriage is not a partnership, it is an institution unto itself like no other. Hillary is Clinton's partner and thats it. He gets professional support from her and he gives her her platform and sense of importance. But she is not his wife or else he wouldn't be getting head in the Oval Office. She stated herself that she is no "Tammy Wynette." But I digress. I love you anyway Soror, much Coleman luv (or should that be Brown-Coleman luv, lol)
If I recall correctly, you were the one who said Hillary became Bill's business partner.

I was looking at the wife, mother, homemaker idealism from what would be considered "non-tradititonal" to most people. What if the couple is infertile or chooses not to have children? There goes the mother part. Or if the husband likes to cook, clean, and do other household chores? Some women can't cook, sew, or keep a house, so there went the homemaker. But in the end, they are still husband and wife. That's the point of that issue I was trying to make.

LOL@ Brown-Coleman Luv....


Reply With Quote